Labor productivity in Jordan in 2025 — 46,257 $/person. Ranked 86 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 5.5%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Jordan
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46,257 | +953 | +2.1% |
| 2024 | 45,304 | +499 | +1.11% |
| 2023 | 44,805 | −2,461 | −5.21% |
| 2022 | 47,266 | −718 | −1.5% |
| 2021 | 47,984 | +2,434 | +5.34% |
| 2020 | 45,550 | −1,131 | −2.42% |
| 2019 | 46,681 | −1,287 | −2.68% |
| 2018 | 47,969 | +876 | +1.86% |
| 2017 | 47,092 | −75 | −0.16% |
| 2016 | 47,167 | −1,893 | −3.86% |
| 2015 | 49,061 | −4,082 | −7.68% |
| 2014 | 53,143 | −2,749 | −4.92% |
| 2013 | 55,892 | +22 | +0.04% |
| 2012 | 55,871 | +1,141 | +2.08% |
| 2011 | 54,730 | +745 | +1.38% |
| 2010 | 53,985 | +391 | +0.73% |
| 2009 | 53,594 | +424 | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 53,170 | +2,151 | +4.22% |
| 2007 | 51,019 | −2,847 | −5.29% |
| 2006 | 53,867 | +687 | +1.29% |
| 2005 | 53,179 | +1,932 | +3.77% |
| 2004 | 51,247 | +2,086 | +4.24% |
| 2003 | 49,162 | +1,476 | +3.09% |
| 2002 | 47,686 | +2,227 | +4.9% |
| 2001 | 45,459 | +2,379 | +5.52% |
| 2000 | 43,080 | +768 | +1.82% |
| 1999 | 42,312 | +406 | +0.97% |
| 1998 | 41,906 | +313 | +0.75% |
| 1997 | 41,593 | +249 | +0.6% |
| 1996 | 41,345 | −1,091 | −2.57% |
| 1995 | 42,436 | −575 | −1.34% |
| 1994 | 43,011 | −1,946 | −4.33% |
| 1993 | 44,957 | −1,155 | −2.5% |
| 1992 | 46,112 | +2,268 | +5.17% |
| 1991 | 43,844 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
