Labor productivity in Ecuador in 2025 — 30,171 $/person. Ranked 110 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 21%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Ecuador
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30,171 | +595 | +2.01% |
| 2024 | 29,577 | −1,112 | −3.62% |
| 2023 | 30,689 | +641 | +2.13% |
| 2022 | 30,048 | +958 | +3.29% |
| 2021 | 29,090 | −897 | −2.99% |
| 2020 | 29,987 | +196 | +0.66% |
| 2019 | 29,792 | −375 | −1.24% |
| 2018 | 30,166 | +139 | +0.46% |
| 2017 | 30,028 | +593 | +2.01% |
| 2016 | 29,435 | −1,481 | −4.79% |
| 2015 | 30,916 | −2,124 | −6.43% |
| 2014 | 33,040 | +601 | +1.85% |
| 2013 | 32,439 | +1,571 | +5.09% |
| 2012 | 30,867 | +649 | +2.15% |
| 2011 | 30,218 | +1,961 | +6.94% |
| 2010 | 28,257 | +901 | +3.29% |
| 2009 | 27,356 | +911 | +3.45% |
| 2008 | 26,445 | +1,324 | +5.27% |
| 2007 | 25,121 | +210 | +0.84% |
| 2006 | 24,911 | +49 | +0.2% |
| 2005 | 24,863 | +575 | +2.37% |
| 2004 | 24,287 | +82 | +0.34% |
| 2003 | 24,205 | +104 | +0.43% |
| 2002 | 24,101 | +508 | +2.15% |
| 2001 | 23,593 | +64 | +0.27% |
| 2000 | 23,530 | +291 | +1.25% |
| 1999 | 23,238 | −1,118 | −4.59% |
| 1998 | 24,357 | −599 | −2.4% |
| 1997 | 24,956 | +167 | +0.67% |
| 1996 | 24,788 | −158 | −0.63% |
| 1995 | 24,946 | −62 | −0.25% |
| 1994 | 25,008 | +336 | +1.36% |
| 1993 | 24,672 | −126 | −0.51% |
| 1992 | 24,798 | −144 | −0.58% |
| 1991 | 24,942 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
