Labor productivity in Colombia in 2025 — 40,369 $/person. Ranked 94 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 56.1%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Colombia
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 40,369 | −4 | −0.01% |
| 2024 | 40,373 | +143 | +0.36% |
| 2023 | 40,230 | −1,102 | −2.67% |
| 2022 | 41,332 | +1,455 | +3.65% |
| 2021 | 39,877 | +1,873 | +4.93% |
| 2020 | 38,004 | −572 | −1.48% |
| 2019 | 38,576 | +1,163 | +3.11% |
| 2018 | 37,412 | +509 | +1.38% |
| 2017 | 36,904 | −40 | −0.11% |
| 2016 | 36,944 | +588 | +1.62% |
| 2015 | 36,356 | +359 | +1% |
| 2014 | 35,996 | +938 | +2.68% |
| 2013 | 35,059 | +1,251 | +3.7% |
| 2012 | 33,808 | +281 | +0.84% |
| 2011 | 33,527 | +1,058 | +3.26% |
| 2010 | 32,469 | +386 | +1.2% |
| 2009 | 32,082 | −1,395 | −4.17% |
| 2008 | 33,477 | +280 | +0.84% |
| 2007 | 33,197 | +1,841 | +5.87% |
| 2006 | 31,356 | +1,695 | +5.72% |
| 2005 | 29,661 | +482 | +1.65% |
| 2004 | 29,179 | +1,363 | +4.9% |
| 2003 | 27,816 | −273 | −0.97% |
| 2002 | 28,089 | +349 | +1.26% |
| 2001 | 27,740 | −2,058 | −6.91% |
| 2000 | 29,798 | +313 | +1.06% |
| 1999 | 29,485 | +151 | +0.52% |
| 1998 | 29,334 | +490 | +1.7% |
| 1997 | 28,844 | +317 | +1.11% |
| 1996 | 28,528 | +863 | +3.12% |
| 1995 | 27,664 | +730 | +2.71% |
| 1994 | 26,934 | +830 | +3.18% |
| 1993 | 26,103 | +125 | +0.48% |
| 1992 | 25,979 | +115 | +0.45% |
| 1991 | 25,863 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.