Labor productivity in Chile in 2025 — 65,211 $/person. Ranked 61 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 99.5%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Chile
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 65,211 | +1,107 | +1.73% |
| 2024 | 64,104 | +96 | +0.15% |
| 2023 | 64,008 | −1,133 | −1.74% |
| 2022 | 65,141 | −2,924 | −4.3% |
| 2021 | 68,066 | +3,948 | +6.16% |
| 2020 | 64,118 | +4,607 | +7.74% |
| 2019 | 59,511 | −754 | −1.25% |
| 2018 | 60,265 | +1,023 | +1.73% |
| 2017 | 59,242 | −764 | −1.27% |
| 2016 | 60,006 | +253 | +0.42% |
| 2015 | 59,754 | +229 | +0.38% |
| 2014 | 59,525 | +216 | +0.36% |
| 2013 | 59,309 | +734 | +1.25% |
| 2012 | 58,575 | +2,215 | +3.93% |
| 2011 | 56,360 | +669 | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 55,690 | −1,319 | −2.31% |
| 2009 | 57,010 | −63 | −0.11% |
| 2008 | 57,072 | +537 | +0.95% |
| 2007 | 56,536 | +1,032 | +1.86% |
| 2006 | 55,504 | +951 | +1.74% |
| 2005 | 54,553 | +1,275 | +2.39% |
| 2004 | 53,278 | +2,318 | +4.55% |
| 2003 | 50,960 | +723 | +1.44% |
| 2002 | 50,236 | +1,008 | +2.05% |
| 2001 | 49,228 | +1,366 | +2.85% |
| 2000 | 47,861 | +1,700 | +3.68% |
| 1999 | 46,161 | +1,069 | +2.37% |
| 1998 | 45,092 | +1,005 | +2.28% |
| 1997 | 44,087 | +2,183 | +5.21% |
| 1996 | 41,904 | +2,795 | +7.15% |
| 1995 | 39,109 | +1,649 | +4.4% |
| 1994 | 37,460 | +1,408 | +3.91% |
| 1993 | 36,051 | +1,308 | +3.76% |
| 1992 | 34,744 | +2,054 | +6.28% |
| 1991 | 32,690 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
