Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Portugal

Female unemployment in Portugal in 2025 — 6.53%. Ranked 108 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 0.89 pp.

2025 6.53% −0.37 pp vs 2024
World rank 108of 182
Period maximum 16.45%2013
Period minimum 4.73%2000

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Portugal, 1991–20250510152019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 5.64%1992: 4.78%1993: 6.28%1994: 7.78%1995: 7.79%1996: 8.46%1997: 7.51%1998: 5.67%1999: 5.07%2000: 4.73%2001: 4.95%2002: 5.31%2003: 7.25%2004: 7.18%2005: 8.63%2006: 8.91%2007: 9.49%2008: 8.75%2009: 10.09%2010: 11.86%2011: 13.12%2012: 15.49%2013: 16.45%2014: 14.27%2015: 12.67%2016: 11.12%2017: 9.36%2018: 7.38%2019: 7.06%2020: 7.08%2021: 6.99%2022: 6.56%2023: 6.86%2024: 6.9%2025: 6.53%
Change over the period: +0.89 pp Annual average: 0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Portugal

Portugal 6.53%
World 4.94%
Southern Europe computed 9.27%
High-income countries computed 4.72%
Female unemployment — Portugal, by year Portugal All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.53 −0.37 pp
2024 6.9 +0.04 pp
2023 6.86 +0.3 pp
2022 6.56 −0.43 pp
2021 6.99 −0.09 pp
2020 7.08 +0.02 pp
2019 7.06 −0.32 pp
2018 7.38 −1.98 pp
2017 9.36 −1.76 pp
2016 11.12 −1.55 pp
2015 12.67 −1.6 pp
2014 14.27 −2.18 pp
2013 16.45 +0.96 pp
2012 15.49 +2.37 pp
2011 13.12 +1.26 pp
2010 11.86 +1.77 pp
2009 10.09 +1.34 pp
2008 8.75 −0.74 pp
2007 9.49 +0.59 pp
2006 8.91 +0.27 pp
2005 8.63 +1.45 pp
2004 7.18 −0.07 pp
2003 7.25 +1.94 pp
2002 5.31 +0.36 pp
2001 4.95 +0.22 pp
2000 4.73 −0.34 pp
1999 5.07 −0.6 pp
1998 5.67 −1.84 pp
1997 7.51 −0.95 pp
1996 8.46 +0.67 pp
1995 7.79 +0.02 pp
1994 7.78 +1.49 pp
1993 6.28 +1.51 pp
1992 4.78 −0.86 pp
1991 5.64

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.