Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Southern Europe

Female unemployment in Southern Europe in 2025 — 9.27%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 7.46 pp.

2025 9.27% −0.37 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 20.39%2013
Period minimum 9.27%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Southern Europe, 1991–202551015202519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 16.73%1992: 17.1%1993: 18.6%1994: 19.65%1995: 19.68%1996: 19.61%1997: 19.22%1998: 19.08%1999: 17.89%2000: 16.56%2001: 14.26%2002: 14.44%2003: 14.28%2004: 13.85%2005: 13.03%2006: 12.1%2007: 11.19%2008: 11.43%2009: 13.84%2010: 15.34%2011: 16.48%2012: 19.12%2013: 20.39%2014: 19.89%2015: 18.47%2016: 17.23%2017: 15.65%2018: 14.21%2019: 13.15%2020: 13.16%2021: 13.1%2022: 11.57%2023: 10.76%2024: 9.64%2025: 9.27%
Change over the period: −7.46 pp Annual average: -0.22 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Southern Europe

Southern Europe 9.27%
World 4.94%
Female unemployment — Southern Europe, by year Southern Europe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 9.27 −0.37 pp
2024 9.64 −1.12 pp
2023 10.76 −0.81 pp
2022 11.57 −1.53 pp
2021 13.1 −0.06 pp
2020 13.16 +0 pp
2019 13.15 −1.06 pp
2018 14.21 −1.44 pp
2017 15.65 −1.58 pp
2016 17.23 −1.24 pp
2015 18.47 −1.42 pp
2014 19.89 −0.5 pp
2013 20.39 +1.27 pp
2012 19.12 +2.65 pp
2011 16.48 +1.14 pp
2010 15.34 +1.5 pp
2009 13.84 +2.41 pp
2008 11.43 +0.23 pp
2007 11.19 −0.9 pp
2006 12.1 −0.93 pp
2005 13.03 −0.82 pp
2004 13.85 −0.43 pp
2003 14.28 −0.16 pp
2002 14.44 +0.18 pp
2001 14.26 −2.3 pp
2000 16.56 −1.33 pp
1999 17.89 −1.19 pp
1998 19.08 −0.14 pp
1997 19.22 −0.39 pp
1996 19.61 −0.07 pp
1995 19.68 +0.03 pp
1994 19.65 +1.04 pp
1993 18.6 +1.5 pp
1992 17.1 +0.38 pp
1991 16.73

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.