Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Jamaica

Female unemployment in Jamaica in 2025 — 4.29%. Ranked 70 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 3.93 pp.

2025 4.29% +0.2 pp vs 2024
World rank 70of 182
Period maximum 12.58%2013
Period minimum 3.93%2023

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Jamaica, 1991–202505101519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 8.21%1992: 8.41%1993: 8.23%1994: 8.36%1995: 8.36%1996: 8.72%1997: 8.83%1998: 9.03%1999: 9.01%2000: 8.95%2001: 8.82%2002: 8.8%2003: 8.7%2004: 8.7%2005: 8.75%2006: 8.79%2007: 8.79%2008: 8.87%2009: 9.11%2010: 9.77%2011: 10.26%2012: 11.22%2013: 12.58%2014: 11.65%2015: 11.45%2016: 11.38%2017: 9.71%2018: 6.95%2019: 6.37%2020: 7.44%2021: 6.34%2022: 5.14%2023: 3.93%2024: 4.09%2025: 4.29%
Change over the period: −3.93 pp Annual average: -0.12 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Jamaica

Jamaica 4.29%
World 4.94%
Female unemployment — Jamaica, by year Jamaica All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 4.29 +0.2 pp
2024 4.09 +0.16 pp
2023 3.93 −1.21 pp
2022 5.14 −1.21 pp
2021 6.34 −1.09 pp
2020 7.44 +1.06 pp
2019 6.37 −0.58 pp
2018 6.95 −2.76 pp
2017 9.71 −1.67 pp
2016 11.38 −0.07 pp
2015 11.45 −0.2 pp
2014 11.65 −0.92 pp
2013 12.58 +1.36 pp
2012 11.22 +0.96 pp
2011 10.26 +0.5 pp
2010 9.77 +0.65 pp
2009 9.11 +0.25 pp
2008 8.87 +0.07 pp
2007 8.79 +0 pp
2006 8.79 +0.04 pp
2005 8.75 +0.05 pp
2004 8.7 +0 pp
2003 8.7 −0.1 pp
2002 8.8 −0.03 pp
2001 8.82 −0.12 pp
2000 8.95 −0.06 pp
1999 9.01 −0.03 pp
1998 9.03 +0.2 pp
1997 8.83 +0.11 pp
1996 8.72 +0.37 pp
1995 8.36 −0 pp
1994 8.36 +0.13 pp
1993 8.23 −0.18 pp
1992 8.41 +0.2 pp
1991 8.21

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.