Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Haiti

Female unemployment in Haiti in 2025 — 18.03%. Ranked 165 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 9.49 pp.

2025 18.03% +0.21 pp vs 2024
World rank 165of 182
Period maximum 19.09%2007
Period minimum 8.15%1997

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Haiti, 1991–2025510152019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 8.54%1992: 8.6%1993: 8.75%1994: 9.1%1995: 8.71%1996: 8.48%1997: 8.15%1998: 8.32%1999: 8.35%2000: 9.73%2001: 11.17%2002: 12.6%2003: 13.88%2004: 15.29%2005: 16.57%2006: 18.03%2007: 19.09%2008: 18.63%2009: 17.95%2010: 17.99%2011: 17.37%2012: 17.14%2013: 16.67%2014: 16.78%2015: 16.75%2016: 16.88%2017: 16.9%2018: 16.9%2019: 17.09%2020: 18.61%2021: 18.31%2022: 17.69%2023: 17.61%2024: 17.82%2025: 18.03%
Change over the period: +9.49 pp Annual average: 0.28 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Haiti

Haiti 18.03%
World 4.94%
Low-income countries computed 6.57%
Female unemployment — Haiti, by year Haiti All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 18.03 +0.21 pp
2024 17.82 +0.2 pp
2023 17.61 −0.08 pp
2022 17.69 −0.62 pp
2021 18.31 −0.3 pp
2020 18.61 +1.52 pp
2019 17.09 +0.19 pp
2018 16.9 −0.01 pp
2017 16.9 +0.02 pp
2016 16.88 +0.13 pp
2015 16.75 −0.03 pp
2014 16.78 +0.11 pp
2013 16.67 −0.47 pp
2012 17.14 −0.23 pp
2011 17.37 −0.62 pp
2010 17.99 +0.04 pp
2009 17.95 −0.68 pp
2008 18.63 −0.45 pp
2007 19.09 +1.06 pp
2006 18.03 +1.46 pp
2005 16.57 +1.28 pp
2004 15.29 +1.41 pp
2003 13.88 +1.28 pp
2002 12.6 +1.43 pp
2001 11.17 +1.44 pp
2000 9.73 +1.39 pp
1999 8.35 +0.03 pp
1998 8.32 +0.17 pp
1997 8.15 −0.34 pp
1996 8.48 −0.23 pp
1995 8.71 −0.39 pp
1994 9.1 +0.35 pp
1993 8.75 +0.15 pp
1992 8.6 +0.06 pp
1991 8.54

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.