Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Barbados

Female unemployment in Barbados in 2025 — 6.96%. Ranked 115 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 18.18 pp.

2025 6.96% +0.15 pp vs 2024
World rank 115of 182
Period maximum 28.01%1994
Period minimum 6.8%2024

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Barbados, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 25.13%1992: 25.68%1993: 27.73%1994: 28.01%1995: 22.87%1996: 17.8%1997: 18.05%1998: 16.56%1999: 13.49%2000: 11.4%2001: 11.82%2002: 12.21%2003: 12.56%2004: 10.45%2005: 10.8%2006: 9.81%2007: 8.43%2008: 9.42%2009: 9.89%2010: 10.47%2011: 12.61%2012: 12.26%2013: 11.43%2014: 12.65%2015: 8.97%2016: 8.65%2017: 8.78%2018: 8.53%2019: 7.28%2020: 10.09%2021: 11.55%2022: 7.57%2023: 6.9%2024: 6.8%2025: 6.96%
Change over the period: −18.18 pp Annual average: -0.53 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Barbados

Barbados 6.96%
World 4.94%
High-income countries computed 4.72%
Female unemployment — Barbados, by year Barbados All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.96 +0.15 pp
2024 6.8 −0.09 pp
2023 6.9 −0.67 pp
2022 7.57 −3.99 pp
2021 11.55 +1.47 pp
2020 10.09 +2.81 pp
2019 7.28 −1.25 pp
2018 8.53 −0.25 pp
2017 8.78 +0.13 pp
2016 8.65 −0.32 pp
2015 8.97 −3.68 pp
2014 12.65 +1.21 pp
2013 11.43 −0.83 pp
2012 12.26 −0.36 pp
2011 12.61 +2.14 pp
2010 10.47 +0.58 pp
2009 9.89 +0.47 pp
2008 9.42 +0.99 pp
2007 8.43 −1.39 pp
2006 9.81 −0.99 pp
2005 10.8 +0.34 pp
2004 10.45 −2.11 pp
2003 12.56 +0.35 pp
2002 12.21 +0.39 pp
2001 11.82 +0.42 pp
2000 11.4 −2.09 pp
1999 13.49 −3.07 pp
1998 16.56 −1.49 pp
1997 18.05 +0.25 pp
1996 17.8 −5.07 pp
1995 22.87 −5.14 pp
1994 28.01 +0.28 pp
1993 27.73 +2.05 pp
1992 25.68 +0.55 pp
1991 25.13

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.