Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Tajikistan

Safely managed drinking water in Tajikistan in 2024 — 65.1%. Ranked 94 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 29.6 pp.

2024 65.1% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 94of 148
Period maximum 65.1%2024
Period minimum 35.5%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Tajikistan, 2000–202430405060702000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 35.5%2001: 36.6%2002: 37.8%2003: 38.9%2004: 40.1%2005: 41.4%2006: 42.6%2007: 43.9%2008: 45.2%2009: 46.6%2010: 48%2011: 49.4%2012: 50.8%2013: 52.3%2014: 53.8%2015: 55.4%2016: 57%2017: 58.6%2018: 60.3%2019: 62%2020: 63%2021: 63.9%2022: 64.9%2023: 65%2024: 65.1%
Change over the period: +29.6 pp Annual average: 1.23 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Tajikistan

Tajikistan 65.1%
World 73.7%
Central Asia computed 82.6%
Safely managed drinking water — Tajikistan, by year Tajikistan All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 65.1 +0.1 pp
2023 65 +0.1 pp
2022 64.9 +1 pp
2021 63.9 +1 pp
2020 63 +1 pp
2019 62 +1.7 pp
2018 60.3 +1.7 pp
2017 58.6 +1.6 pp
2016 57 +1.6 pp
2015 55.4 +1.6 pp
2014 53.8 +1.5 pp
2013 52.3 +1.5 pp
2012 50.8 +1.4 pp
2011 49.4 +1.4 pp
2010 48 +1.4 pp
2009 46.6 +1.3 pp
2008 45.2 +1.3 pp
2007 43.9 +1.3 pp
2006 42.6 +1.3 pp
2005 41.4 +1.2 pp
2004 40.1 +1.2 pp
2003 38.9 +1.2 pp
2002 37.8 +1.1 pp
2001 36.6 +1.1 pp
2000 35.5

Central Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.