Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — North Korea

Safely managed drinking water in North Korea in 2023 — 66.6%. Ranked 93 in the world out of 149. Since 2000, the indicator has fallen by 2.4 pp.

2023 66.6% +0.1 pp vs 2022
World rank 93of 149
Period maximum 69.1%2003
Period minimum 66.3%2019

Trend over time

2000–2023 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — North Korea, 2000–202366676869702000200320062009201220152018202120232000: 69%2001: 69%2002: 69%2003: 69.1%2004: 69%2005: 68.8%2006: 68.6%2007: 68.4%2008: 68.2%2009: 68%2010: 67.8%2011: 67.7%2012: 67.5%2013: 67.3%2014: 67.1%2015: 67%2016: 66.8%2017: 66.6%2018: 66.5%2019: 66.3%2020: 66.4%2021: 66.5%2022: 66.5%2023: 66.6%
Change over the period: −2.4 pp Annual average: -0.1 pp

Comparison, 2023

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: North Korea

North Korea 66.6%
World 72%
Eastern Asia computed 94%
Safely managed drinking water — North Korea, by year North Korea All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2023 66.6 +0.1 pp
2022 66.5 +0.1 pp
2021 66.5 +0.1 pp
2020 66.4 +0.1 pp
2019 66.3 −0.2 pp
2018 66.5 −0.2 pp
2017 66.6 −0.2 pp
2016 66.8 −0.2 pp
2015 67 −0.2 pp
2014 67.1 −0.2 pp
2013 67.3 −0.2 pp
2012 67.5 −0.2 pp
2011 67.7 −0.2 pp
2010 67.8 −0.2 pp
2009 68 −0.2 pp
2008 68.2 −0.2 pp
2007 68.4 −0.2 pp
2006 68.6 −0.2 pp
2005 68.8 −0.2 pp
2004 69 −0 pp
2003 69.1 +0 pp
2002 69 +0 pp
2001 69 +0 pp
2000 69

Eastern Asia, 2023

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.