Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Georgia

Safely managed drinking water in Georgia in 2024 — 70.5%. Ranked 86 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 11.1 pp.

2024 70.5% +0.3 pp vs 2023
World rank 86of 148
Period maximum 70.5%2024
Period minimum 59.4%2001

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Georgia, 2000–202455606570752000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 59.4%2001: 59.4%2002: 59.5%2003: 59.7%2004: 59.9%2005: 60.1%2006: 60.3%2007: 60.6%2008: 60.8%2009: 61%2010: 61.2%2011: 61.4%2012: 61.6%2013: 62.6%2014: 63.7%2015: 64.7%2016: 65.8%2017: 66.9%2018: 68%2019: 69.1%2020: 69.5%2021: 69.7%2022: 70%2023: 70.3%2024: 70.5%
Change over the period: +11.1 pp Annual average: 0.46 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Georgia

Georgia 70.5%
World 73.7%
Western Asia computed 75%
Safely managed drinking water — Georgia, by year Georgia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 70.5 +0.3 pp
2023 70.3 +0.3 pp
2022 70 +0.3 pp
2021 69.7 +0.3 pp
2020 69.5 +0.4 pp
2019 69.1 +1.1 pp
2018 68 +1.1 pp
2017 66.9 +1.1 pp
2016 65.8 +1.1 pp
2015 64.7 +1.1 pp
2014 63.7 +1 pp
2013 62.6 +1 pp
2012 61.6 +0.2 pp
2011 61.4 +0.2 pp
2010 61.2 +0.2 pp
2009 61 +0.2 pp
2008 60.8 +0.2 pp
2007 60.6 +0.2 pp
2006 60.3 +0.2 pp
2005 60.1 +0.2 pp
2004 59.9 +0.2 pp
2003 59.7 +0.2 pp
2002 59.5 +0.1 pp
2001 59.4 −0 pp
2000 59.4

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.