Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Belarus

Safely managed drinking water in Belarus in 2024 — 93.1%. Ranked 56 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 11.1 pp.

2024 93.1% +0 pp vs 2023
World rank 56of 148
Period maximum 93.1%2024
Period minimum 81.9%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Belarus, 2000–2024808590952000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 81.9%2001: 82.1%2002: 82.2%2003: 82.3%2004: 83.4%2005: 84.4%2006: 85.5%2007: 86.5%2008: 87.5%2009: 88.5%2010: 89.5%2011: 90.5%2012: 91.4%2013: 92.4%2014: 92.5%2015: 92.5%2016: 92.6%2017: 92.7%2018: 92.7%2019: 92.8%2020: 92.8%2021: 92.9%2022: 93%2023: 93%2024: 93.1%
Change over the period: +11.1 pp Annual average: 0.46 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Belarus

Belarus 93.1%
World 73.7%
Eastern Europe computed 82.9%
Safely managed drinking water — Belarus, by year Belarus All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 93.1 +0 pp
2023 93 +0.1 pp
2022 93 +0.1 pp
2021 92.9 +0.1 pp
2020 92.8 +0.1 pp
2019 92.8 +0.1 pp
2018 92.7 +0.1 pp
2017 92.7 +0.1 pp
2016 92.6 +0.1 pp
2015 92.5 +0.1 pp
2014 92.5 +0.1 pp
2013 92.4 +0.9 pp
2012 91.4 +0.9 pp
2011 90.5 +1 pp
2010 89.5 +1 pp
2009 88.5 +1 pp
2008 87.5 +1 pp
2007 86.5 +1 pp
2006 85.5 +1 pp
2005 84.4 +1 pp
2004 83.4 +1.1 pp
2003 82.3 +0.1 pp
2002 82.2 +0.1 pp
2001 82.1 +0.1 pp
2000 81.9

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.