Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Serbia

Youth unemployment in Serbia in 2025 — 20.93%. Ranked 140 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 8.5 pp.

2025 20.93% −0.52 pp vs 2024
World rank 140of 182
Period maximum 51.24%2012
Period minimum 20.93%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Serbia, 1991–2025203040506019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 29.43%1992: 29.41%1993: 29.41%1994: 29.42%1995: 29.45%1996: 29.2%1997: 30.83%1998: 30.64%1999: 30.33%2000: 28.03%2001: 28.66%2002: 31.33%2003: 35.06%2004: 41.73%2005: 47.13%2006: 48%2007: 43.61%2008: 35.08%2009: 41.39%2010: 46.44%2011: 51.18%2012: 51.24%2013: 49.46%2014: 47.63%2015: 43.23%2016: 34.96%2017: 31.91%2018: 29.7%2019: 27.5%2020: 26.61%2021: 24.5%2022: 23.27%2023: 24.13%2024: 21.45%2025: 20.93%
Change over the period: −8.5 pp Annual average: -0.25 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Serbia

Serbia 20.93%
World 13.41%
Southern Europe computed 22.09%
Youth unemployment — Serbia, by year Serbia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 20.93 −0.52 pp
2024 21.45 −2.68 pp
2023 24.13 +0.86 pp
2022 23.27 −1.23 pp
2021 24.5 −2.11 pp
2020 26.61 −0.89 pp
2019 27.5 −2.2 pp
2018 29.7 −2.21 pp
2017 31.91 −3.06 pp
2016 34.96 −8.27 pp
2015 43.23 −4.4 pp
2014 47.63 −1.83 pp
2013 49.46 −1.78 pp
2012 51.24 +0.06 pp
2011 51.18 +4.74 pp
2010 46.44 +5.05 pp
2009 41.39 +6.32 pp
2008 35.08 −8.53 pp
2007 43.61 −4.4 pp
2006 48 +0.87 pp
2005 47.13 +5.41 pp
2004 41.73 +6.67 pp
2003 35.06 +3.73 pp
2002 31.33 +2.67 pp
2001 28.66 +0.63 pp
2000 28.03 −2.3 pp
1999 30.33 −0.31 pp
1998 30.64 −0.19 pp
1997 30.83 +1.63 pp
1996 29.2 −0.26 pp
1995 29.45 +0.04 pp
1994 29.42 +0.01 pp
1993 29.41 +0 pp
1992 29.41 −0.02 pp
1991 29.43

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.