Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Croatia

Youth unemployment in Croatia in 2025 — 16.47%. Ranked 118 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 23.8 pp.

2025 16.47% −0 pp vs 2024
World rank 118of 182
Period maximum 50.49%2013
Period minimum 16.47%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Croatia, 1991–2025020406019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 40.27%1992: 38.18%1993: 36.07%1994: 33.48%1995: 31.16%1996: 29.08%1997: 28.15%1998: 31.85%1999: 36.58%2000: 41.87%2001: 39.72%2002: 36.53%2003: 36.09%2004: 32.83%2005: 32.54%2006: 29.1%2007: 25.12%2008: 23.68%2009: 25.21%2010: 32.36%2011: 36.67%2012: 42.51%2013: 50.49%2014: 45.7%2015: 42.31%2016: 30.95%2017: 27.43%2018: 23.51%2019: 16.71%2020: 20.67%2021: 21.54%2022: 17.74%2023: 18.91%2024: 16.48%2025: 16.47%
Change over the period: −23.8 pp Annual average: -0.7 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Croatia

Croatia 16.47%
World 13.41%
Southern Europe computed 22.09%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Croatia, by year Croatia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 16.47 −0 pp
2024 16.48 −2.43 pp
2023 18.91 +1.17 pp
2022 17.74 −3.8 pp
2021 21.54 +0.87 pp
2020 20.67 +3.96 pp
2019 16.71 −6.8 pp
2018 23.51 −3.92 pp
2017 27.43 −3.52 pp
2016 30.95 −11.36 pp
2015 42.31 −3.39 pp
2014 45.7 −4.79 pp
2013 50.49 +7.98 pp
2012 42.51 +5.85 pp
2011 36.67 +4.31 pp
2010 32.36 +7.14 pp
2009 25.21 +1.54 pp
2008 23.68 −1.45 pp
2007 25.12 −3.98 pp
2006 29.1 −3.44 pp
2005 32.54 −0.29 pp
2004 32.83 −3.26 pp
2003 36.09 −0.44 pp
2002 36.53 −3.19 pp
2001 39.72 −2.15 pp
2000 41.87 +5.29 pp
1999 36.58 +4.73 pp
1998 31.85 +3.7 pp
1997 28.15 −0.92 pp
1996 29.08 −2.08 pp
1995 31.16 −2.32 pp
1994 33.48 −2.6 pp
1993 36.07 −2.11 pp
1992 38.18 −2.09 pp
1991 40.27

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.