Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Nepal

Youth unemployment in Nepal in 2025 — 20.56%. Ranked 139 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 1.74 pp.

2025 20.56% −0.08 pp vs 2024
World rank 139of 182
Period maximum 24.07%2020
Period minimum 18.78%1994

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Nepal, 1991–2025182022242619911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 18.82%1992: 18.81%1993: 18.83%1994: 18.78%1995: 18.81%1996: 18.78%1997: 18.88%1998: 18.89%1999: 18.91%2000: 18.88%2001: 18.83%2002: 18.96%2003: 19.05%2004: 19.1%2005: 19.05%2006: 19.13%2007: 19.22%2008: 19.2%2009: 19.21%2010: 19.21%2011: 19.29%2012: 19.31%2013: 19.38%2014: 19.35%2015: 19.4%2016: 19.55%2017: 19.57%2018: 19.6%2019: 19.68%2020: 24.07%2021: 22.64%2022: 20.61%2023: 20.43%2024: 20.64%2025: 20.56%
Change over the period: +1.74 pp Annual average: 0.05 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Nepal

Nepal 20.56%
World 13.41%
South Asia 15.4%
Southern Asia computed 15.06%
Youth unemployment — Nepal, by year Nepal All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 20.56 −0.08 pp
2024 20.64 +0.21 pp
2023 20.43 −0.18 pp
2022 20.61 −2.03 pp
2021 22.64 −1.43 pp
2020 24.07 +4.39 pp
2019 19.68 +0.07 pp
2018 19.6 +0.03 pp
2017 19.57 +0.02 pp
2016 19.55 +0.15 pp
2015 19.4 +0.05 pp
2014 19.35 −0.03 pp
2013 19.38 +0.07 pp
2012 19.31 +0.01 pp
2011 19.29 +0.09 pp
2010 19.21 −0.01 pp
2009 19.21 +0.01 pp
2008 19.2 −0.02 pp
2007 19.22 +0.09 pp
2006 19.13 +0.07 pp
2005 19.05 −0.04 pp
2004 19.1 +0.04 pp
2003 19.05 +0.1 pp
2002 18.96 +0.13 pp
2001 18.83 −0.05 pp
2000 18.88 −0.03 pp
1999 18.91 +0.02 pp
1998 18.89 +0.01 pp
1997 18.88 +0.09 pp
1996 18.78 −0.03 pp
1995 18.81 +0.03 pp
1994 18.78 −0.04 pp
1993 18.83 +0.02 pp
1992 18.81 −0.01 pp
1991 18.82

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.