Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Bhutan

Youth unemployment in Bhutan in 2025 — 17.05%. Ranked 120 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 12.82 pp.

2025 17.05% −0.88 pp vs 2024
World rank 120of 182
Period maximum 27.18%2022
Period minimum 4.19%1999

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Bhutan, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 4.24%1992: 4.25%1993: 4.3%1994: 4.26%1995: 4.24%1996: 4.21%1997: 4.21%1998: 4.22%1999: 4.19%2000: 4.9%2001: 5.59%2002: 5.49%2003: 5.38%2004: 7.49%2005: 9.44%2006: 9.54%2007: 11.41%2008: 11.94%2009: 12.42%2010: 8.78%2011: 8.91%2012: 6.98%2013: 9.39%2014: 9.02%2015: 10.12%2016: 11.61%2017: 13.36%2018: 15.2%2019: 11.56%2020: 21.99%2021: 20.61%2022: 27.18%2023: 14.94%2024: 17.93%2025: 17.05%
Change over the period: +12.82 pp Annual average: 0.38 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Bhutan

Bhutan 17.05%
World 13.41%
South Asia 15.4%
Southern Asia computed 15.06%
Youth unemployment — Bhutan, by year Bhutan All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 17.05 −0.88 pp
2024 17.93 +3 pp
2023 14.94 −12.24 pp
2022 27.18 +6.57 pp
2021 20.61 −1.38 pp
2020 21.99 +10.43 pp
2019 11.56 −3.64 pp
2018 15.2 +1.84 pp
2017 13.36 +1.74 pp
2016 11.61 +1.5 pp
2015 10.12 +1.09 pp
2014 9.02 −0.37 pp
2013 9.39 +2.41 pp
2012 6.98 −1.93 pp
2011 8.91 +0.13 pp
2010 8.78 −3.64 pp
2009 12.42 +0.48 pp
2008 11.94 +0.53 pp
2007 11.41 +1.87 pp
2006 9.54 +0.1 pp
2005 9.44 +1.95 pp
2004 7.49 +2.11 pp
2003 5.38 −0.11 pp
2002 5.49 −0.1 pp
2001 5.59 +0.69 pp
2000 4.9 +0.71 pp
1999 4.19 −0.03 pp
1998 4.22 +0.01 pp
1997 4.21 −0 pp
1996 4.21 −0.03 pp
1995 4.24 −0.02 pp
1994 4.26 −0.04 pp
1993 4.3 +0.05 pp
1992 4.25 +0.01 pp
1991 4.24

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.