Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Moldova

Youth unemployment in Moldova in 2025 — 4.2%. Ranked 22 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 0.56 pp.

2025 4.2% −0.3 pp vs 2024
World rank 22of 182
Period maximum 20.9%1999
Period minimum 1.8%2021

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Moldova, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 3.64%1992: 7.02%1993: 7.03%1994: 10.99%1995: 10.06%1996: 14.9%1997: 14.97%1998: 18.8%1999: 20.9%2000: 16%2001: 16.5%2002: 15.33%2003: 14.85%2004: 15.49%2005: 14.64%2006: 9.8%2007: 7.58%2008: 5.89%2009: 6.67%2010: 5.69%2011: 4.87%2012: 3.45%2013: 2.95%2014: 2.3%2015: 3.34%2016: 3.02%2017: 3.93%2018: 3.21%2019: 3.26%2020: 4.05%2021: 1.8%2022: 2.91%2023: 4.03%2024: 4.5%2025: 4.2%
Change over the period: +0.56 pp Annual average: 0.02 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Moldova

Moldova 4.2%
World 13.41%
Eastern Europe computed 9.89%
Youth unemployment — Moldova, by year Moldova All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 4.2 −0.3 pp
2024 4.5 +0.47 pp
2023 4.03 +1.13 pp
2022 2.91 +1.11 pp
2021 1.8 −2.26 pp
2020 4.05 +0.8 pp
2019 3.26 +0.05 pp
2018 3.21 −0.72 pp
2017 3.93 +0.91 pp
2016 3.02 −0.32 pp
2015 3.34 +1.04 pp
2014 2.3 −0.66 pp
2013 2.95 −0.5 pp
2012 3.45 −1.41 pp
2011 4.87 −0.82 pp
2010 5.69 −0.98 pp
2009 6.67 +0.78 pp
2008 5.89 −1.69 pp
2007 7.58 −2.21 pp
2006 9.8 −4.85 pp
2005 14.64 −0.85 pp
2004 15.49 +0.64 pp
2003 14.85 −0.48 pp
2002 15.33 −1.16 pp
2001 16.5 +0.49 pp
2000 16 −4.9 pp
1999 20.9 +2.1 pp
1998 18.8 +3.83 pp
1997 14.97 +0.07 pp
1996 14.9 +4.84 pp
1995 10.06 −0.93 pp
1994 10.99 +3.96 pp
1993 7.03 +0.01 pp
1992 7.02 +3.39 pp
1991 3.64

Eastern Europe, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.