Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Eastern Europe

Youth unemployment in Eastern Europe in 2025 — 9.89%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 3.92 pp.

2025 9.89% −0.47 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 23.6%1998
Period minimum 9.89%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Eastern Europe, 1991–202551015202519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 13.81%1992: 14.24%1993: 15.45%1994: 17.08%1995: 19.21%1996: 20.23%1997: 21.4%1998: 23.6%1999: 23.47%2000: 22.37%2001: 21.83%2002: 20.77%2003: 20.97%2004: 20.59%2005: 19.05%2006: 18.23%2007: 15.47%2008: 14.54%2009: 18.77%2010: 18.73%2011: 18.27%2012: 18.21%2013: 17.89%2014: 17.75%2015: 18.04%2016: 17.42%2017: 15.77%2018: 15.34%2019: 13.78%2020: 15.79%2021: 15.68%2022: 13.64%2023: 11.93%2024: 10.37%2025: 9.89%
Change over the period: −3.92 pp Annual average: -0.12 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe 9.89%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Eastern Europe, by year Eastern Europe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 9.89 −0.47 pp
2024 10.37 −1.56 pp
2023 11.93 −1.71 pp
2022 13.64 −2.04 pp
2021 15.68 −0.11 pp
2020 15.79 +2.01 pp
2019 13.78 −1.57 pp
2018 15.34 −0.43 pp
2017 15.77 −1.65 pp
2016 17.42 −0.62 pp
2015 18.04 +0.29 pp
2014 17.75 −0.14 pp
2013 17.89 −0.32 pp
2012 18.21 −0.06 pp
2011 18.27 −0.47 pp
2010 18.73 −0.04 pp
2009 18.77 +4.23 pp
2008 14.54 −0.93 pp
2007 15.47 −2.76 pp
2006 18.23 −0.82 pp
2005 19.05 −1.54 pp
2004 20.59 −0.38 pp
2003 20.97 +0.2 pp
2002 20.77 −1.06 pp
2001 21.83 −0.53 pp
2000 22.37 −1.1 pp
1999 23.47 −0.13 pp
1998 23.6 +2.19 pp
1997 21.4 +1.18 pp
1996 20.23 +1.01 pp
1995 19.21 +2.14 pp
1994 17.08 +1.63 pp
1993 15.45 +1.21 pp
1992 14.24 +0.42 pp
1991 13.81

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.