Labor productivity in the United Kingdom in 2025 — 111,234 $/person. Ranked 27 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 54.2%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: United Kingdom
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 111,234 | +1,680 | +1.53% |
| 2024 | 109,554 | +517 | +0.47% |
| 2023 | 109,038 | −966 | −0.88% |
| 2022 | 110,004 | +2,992 | +2.8% |
| 2021 | 107,012 | +9,265 | +9.48% |
| 2020 | 97,746 | −10,164 | −9.42% |
| 2019 | 107,911 | +195 | +0.18% |
| 2018 | 107,716 | +416 | +0.39% |
| 2017 | 107,300 | +2,214 | +2.11% |
| 2016 | 105,086 | +566 | +0.54% |
| 2015 | 104,520 | +378 | +0.36% |
| 2014 | 104,142 | +778 | +0.75% |
| 2013 | 103,364 | +493 | +0.48% |
| 2012 | 102,871 | +592 | +0.58% |
| 2011 | 102,279 | +336 | +0.33% |
| 2010 | 101,943 | +2,061 | +2.06% |
| 2009 | 99,882 | −3,161 | −3.07% |
| 2008 | 103,042 | −977 | −0.94% |
| 2007 | 104,019 | +2,195 | +2.16% |
| 2006 | 101,825 | +1,173 | +1.17% |
| 2005 | 100,652 | +1,761 | +1.78% |
| 2004 | 98,891 | +1,307 | +1.34% |
| 2003 | 97,583 | +2,109 | +2.21% |
| 2002 | 95,475 | +883 | +0.93% |
| 2001 | 94,592 | +1,282 | +1.37% |
| 2000 | 93,311 | +2,654 | +2.93% |
| 1999 | 90,657 | +1,550 | +1.74% |
| 1998 | 89,107 | +1,791 | +2.05% |
| 1997 | 87,316 | +2,533 | +2.99% |
| 1996 | 84,783 | +1,311 | +1.57% |
| 1995 | 83,472 | +1,989 | +2.44% |
| 1994 | 81,483 | +3,321 | +4.25% |
| 1993 | 78,162 | +3,656 | +4.91% |
| 1992 | 74,505 | +2,384 | +3.31% |
| 1991 | 72,122 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
