Labor productivity in Lithuania in 2025 — 97,346 $/person. Ranked 36 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 154.5%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Lithuania
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 97,346 | +2,680 | +2.83% |
| 2024 | 94,667 | +1,744 | +1.88% |
| 2023 | 92,923 | −119 | −0.13% |
| 2022 | 93,042 | −384 | −0.41% |
| 2021 | 93,427 | +4,859 | +5.49% |
| 2020 | 88,567 | +1,354 | +1.55% |
| 2019 | 87,213 | +3,586 | +4.29% |
| 2018 | 83,627 | +2,694 | +3.33% |
| 2017 | 80,933 | +3,604 | +4.66% |
| 2016 | 77,329 | +499 | +0.65% |
| 2015 | 76,830 | +1,224 | +1.62% |
| 2014 | 75,606 | +1,214 | +1.63% |
| 2013 | 74,392 | +1,877 | +2.59% |
| 2012 | 72,515 | +1,797 | +2.54% |
| 2011 | 70,718 | +2,787 | +4.1% |
| 2010 | 67,930 | +4,594 | +7.25% |
| 2009 | 63,336 | −5,116 | −7.47% |
| 2008 | 68,452 | +2,729 | +4.15% |
| 2007 | 65,723 | +5,611 | +9.33% |
| 2006 | 60,112 | +4,165 | +7.44% |
| 2005 | 55,947 | +3,957 | +7.61% |
| 2004 | 51,990 | +4,631 | +9.78% |
| 2003 | 47,359 | +3,008 | +6.78% |
| 2002 | 44,351 | +1,399 | +3.26% |
| 2001 | 42,952 | +3,996 | +10.26% |
| 2000 | 38,956 | +3,025 | +8.42% |
| 1999 | 35,931 | −586 | −1.6% |
| 1998 | 36,517 | +2,898 | +8.62% |
| 1997 | 33,619 | +2,239 | +7.14% |
| 1996 | 31,380 | +1,551 | +5.2% |
| 1995 | 29,829 | +2,609 | +9.58% |
| 1994 | 27,220 | −2,493 | −8.39% |
| 1993 | 29,713 | −782 | −2.56% |
| 1992 | 30,495 | −7,759 | −20.28% |
| 1991 | 38,254 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
