Labor productivity in the Netherlands in 2025 — 129,805 $/person. Ranked 17 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 49.1%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Netherlands
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 129,805 | +2,109 | +1.65% |
| 2024 | 127,696 | +1,020 | +0.81% |
| 2023 | 126,676 | −3,236 | −2.49% |
| 2022 | 129,912 | +2,601 | +2.04% |
| 2021 | 127,312 | +7,208 | +6% |
| 2020 | 120,104 | −4,908 | −3.93% |
| 2019 | 125,011 | +518 | +0.42% |
| 2018 | 124,494 | −50 | −0.04% |
| 2017 | 124,544 | +1,122 | +0.91% |
| 2016 | 123,422 | +1,167 | +0.95% |
| 2015 | 122,255 | +406 | +0.33% |
| 2014 | 121,849 | +2,458 | +2.06% |
| 2013 | 119,390 | +1,214 | +1.03% |
| 2012 | 118,176 | −1,482 | −1.24% |
| 2011 | 119,658 | +1,523 | +1.29% |
| 2010 | 118,135 | +2,063 | +1.78% |
| 2009 | 116,072 | −3,818 | −3.18% |
| 2008 | 119,890 | +1,168 | +0.98% |
| 2007 | 118,722 | +2,872 | +2.48% |
| 2006 | 115,851 | +2,544 | +2.25% |
| 2005 | 113,307 | +3,584 | +3.27% |
| 2004 | 109,723 | +3,261 | +3.06% |
| 2003 | 106,462 | +998 | +0.95% |
| 2002 | 105,463 | +143 | +0.14% |
| 2001 | 105,320 | +767 | +0.73% |
| 2000 | 104,554 | +2,241 | +2.19% |
| 1999 | 102,313 | +3,193 | +3.22% |
| 1998 | 99,120 | +2,488 | +2.57% |
| 1997 | 96,632 | +2,342 | +2.48% |
| 1996 | 94,290 | +1,784 | +1.93% |
| 1995 | 92,506 | +2,381 | +2.64% |
| 1994 | 90,125 | +2,917 | +3.34% |
| 1993 | 87,208 | +1,126 | +1.31% |
| 1992 | 86,082 | −973 | −1.12% |
| 1991 | 87,055 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.