Labor productivity in Luxembourg in 2025 — 262,554 $/person. Ranked 1 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 26.9%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Luxembourg
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 262,554 | −1,310 | −0.5% |
| 2024 | 263,864 | −913 | −0.34% |
| 2023 | 264,777 | −6,258 | −2.31% |
| 2022 | 271,034 | −9,206 | −3.29% |
| 2021 | 280,240 | +4,427 | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 275,814 | −2,999 | −1.08% |
| 2019 | 278,812 | −1,665 | −0.59% |
| 2018 | 280,477 | −3,681 | −1.3% |
| 2017 | 284,158 | −5,501 | −1.9% |
| 2016 | 289,658 | +10,236 | +3.66% |
| 2015 | 279,422 | −2,912 | −1.03% |
| 2014 | 282,334 | −2,077 | −0.73% |
| 2013 | 284,411 | +3,226 | +1.15% |
| 2012 | 281,185 | −10,019 | −3.44% |
| 2011 | 291,204 | −1,512 | −0.52% |
| 2010 | 292,715 | +4,471 | +1.55% |
| 2009 | 288,244 | −27,822 | −8.8% |
| 2008 | 316,067 | −4,269 | −1.33% |
| 2007 | 320,336 | +16,515 | +5.44% |
| 2006 | 303,821 | +12,784 | +4.39% |
| 2005 | 291,037 | −3,549 | −1.2% |
| 2004 | 294,587 | +7,271 | +2.53% |
| 2003 | 287,315 | +10,161 | +3.67% |
| 2002 | 277,154 | +2,520 | +0.92% |
| 2001 | 274,634 | +4,673 | +1.73% |
| 2000 | 269,961 | +8,406 | +3.21% |
| 1999 | 261,555 | +11,890 | +4.76% |
| 1998 | 249,665 | +12,806 | +5.41% |
| 1997 | 236,859 | +6,619 | +2.88% |
| 1996 | 230,240 | −1,544 | −0.67% |
| 1995 | 231,784 | +7,465 | +3.33% |
| 1994 | 224,319 | +8,880 | +4.12% |
| 1993 | 215,439 | +9,730 | +4.73% |
| 1992 | 205,709 | −1,172 | −0.57% |
| 1991 | 206,882 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
