Labor productivity in Mali in 2025 — 8,477 $/person. Ranked 152 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 49.4%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Mali
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8,477 | +169 | +2.03% |
| 2024 | 8,308 | +115 | +1.4% |
| 2023 | 8,194 | +143 | +1.77% |
| 2022 | 8,051 | −186 | −2.25% |
| 2021 | 8,237 | −110 | −1.32% |
| 2020 | 8,347 | −188 | −2.2% |
| 2019 | 8,536 | +378 | +4.63% |
| 2018 | 8,158 | +225 | +2.83% |
| 2017 | 7,933 | +238 | +3.09% |
| 2016 | 7,695 | +270 | +3.64% |
| 2015 | 7,425 | +219 | +3.04% |
| 2014 | 7,206 | +229 | +3.28% |
| 2013 | 6,977 | +52 | +0.75% |
| 2012 | 6,925 | −245 | −3.42% |
| 2011 | 7,170 | +0 | +0.01% |
| 2010 | 7,170 | +173 | +2.47% |
| 2009 | 6,997 | +160 | +2.35% |
| 2008 | 6,837 | +34 | +0.51% |
| 2007 | 6,802 | −96 | −1.39% |
| 2006 | 6,898 | +36 | +0.53% |
| 2005 | 6,862 | −49 | −0.71% |
| 2004 | 6,911 | −113 | −1.61% |
| 2003 | 7,024 | +410 | +6.2% |
| 2002 | 6,614 | −14 | −0.22% |
| 2001 | 6,628 | +716 | +12.1% |
| 2000 | 5,913 | −227 | −3.7% |
| 1999 | 6,139 | +100 | +1.65% |
| 1998 | 6,039 | +217 | +3.73% |
| 1997 | 5,822 | +94 | +1.65% |
| 1996 | 5,728 | +218 | +3.95% |
| 1995 | 5,510 | −86 | −1.54% |
| 1994 | 5,596 | +187 | +3.45% |
| 1993 | 5,409 | +117 | +2.22% |
| 1992 | 5,292 | −381 | −6.72% |
| 1991 | 5,673 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
