Labor productivity in the Gambia in 2025 — 11,842 $/person. Ranked 141 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 6.5%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Gambia
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11,842 | +324 | +2.81% |
| 2024 | 11,518 | +274 | +2.44% |
| 2023 | 11,244 | +356 | +3.27% |
| 2022 | 10,888 | +237 | +2.23% |
| 2021 | 10,651 | +264 | +2.54% |
| 2020 | 10,387 | −88 | −0.84% |
| 2019 | 10,475 | +367 | +3.63% |
| 2018 | 10,107 | +294 | +2.99% |
| 2017 | 9,814 | +54 | +0.55% |
| 2016 | 9,760 | −204 | −2.04% |
| 2015 | 9,964 | −11 | −0.11% |
| 2014 | 9,974 | −597 | −5.65% |
| 2013 | 10,571 | −141 | −1.31% |
| 2012 | 10,712 | +205 | +1.95% |
| 2011 | 10,508 | −1,203 | −10.27% |
| 2010 | 11,711 | +261 | +2.28% |
| 2009 | 11,450 | +308 | +2.76% |
| 2008 | 11,142 | +250 | +2.29% |
| 2007 | 10,892 | −12 | −0.11% |
| 2006 | 10,904 | −376 | −3.33% |
| 2005 | 11,280 | −634 | −5.32% |
| 2004 | 11,914 | +422 | +3.67% |
| 2003 | 11,493 | +397 | +3.58% |
| 2002 | 11,095 | −647 | −5.51% |
| 2001 | 11,742 | +301 | +2.63% |
| 2000 | 11,441 | +275 | +2.46% |
| 1999 | 11,166 | +347 | +3.21% |
| 1998 | 10,819 | +64 | +0.6% |
| 1997 | 10,754 | +201 | +1.9% |
| 1996 | 10,554 | −34 | −0.32% |
| 1995 | 10,588 | −163 | −1.52% |
| 1994 | 10,751 | −273 | −2.47% |
| 1993 | 11,024 | −47 | −0.42% |
| 1992 | 11,071 | −50 | −0.45% |
| 1991 | 11,121 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
