Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Eswatini

Female unemployment in Eswatini in 2025 — 36.03%. Ranked 182 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 13.96 pp.

2025 36.03% −1 pp vs 2024
World rank 182of 182
Period maximum 38.57%2022
Period minimum 22.07%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Eswatini, 1991–2025202530354019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 22.07%1992: 22.51%1993: 23.36%1994: 23.34%1995: 23.26%1996: 24.61%1997: 25.94%1998: 26.65%1999: 27.28%2000: 27.94%2001: 28.61%2002: 29.09%2003: 29.53%2004: 29.94%2005: 30.39%2006: 30.81%2007: 31.31%2008: 30.82%2009: 30.27%2010: 29.48%2011: 28.57%2012: 27.53%2013: 26.72%2014: 25.96%2015: 25.34%2016: 24.49%2017: 26.27%2018: 28.15%2019: 29.84%2020: 34.39%2021: 35.5%2022: 38.57%2023: 37.01%2024: 37.04%2025: 36.03%
Change over the period: +13.96 pp Annual average: 0.41 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Eswatini

Eswatini 36.03%
World 4.94%
Southern Africa computed 32.74%
Female unemployment — Eswatini, by year Eswatini All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 36.03 −1 pp
2024 37.04 +0.02 pp
2023 37.01 −1.56 pp
2022 38.57 +3.07 pp
2021 35.5 +1.11 pp
2020 34.39 +4.55 pp
2019 29.84 +1.69 pp
2018 28.15 +1.88 pp
2017 26.27 +1.77 pp
2016 24.49 −0.84 pp
2015 25.34 −0.62 pp
2014 25.96 −0.76 pp
2013 26.72 −0.81 pp
2012 27.53 −1.04 pp
2011 28.57 −0.91 pp
2010 29.48 −0.79 pp
2009 30.27 −0.55 pp
2008 30.82 −0.5 pp
2007 31.31 +0.5 pp
2006 30.81 +0.42 pp
2005 30.39 +0.46 pp
2004 29.94 +0.4 pp
2003 29.53 +0.44 pp
2002 29.09 +0.49 pp
2001 28.61 +0.67 pp
2000 27.94 +0.66 pp
1999 27.28 +0.63 pp
1998 26.65 +0.71 pp
1997 25.94 +1.33 pp
1996 24.61 +1.35 pp
1995 23.26 −0.07 pp
1994 23.34 −0.03 pp
1993 23.36 +0.85 pp
1992 22.51 +0.44 pp
1991 22.07

Southern Africa, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.