Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Botswana

Female unemployment in Botswana in 2025 — 27.88%. Ranked 176 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 10.84 pp.

2025 27.88% +0.32 pp vs 2024
World rank 176of 182
Period maximum 27.88%2025
Period minimum 17.04%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Botswana, 1991–20251520253019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 17.04%1992: 19.12%1993: 21.08%1994: 23.03%1995: 23.61%1996: 24.19%1997: 23.74%1998: 23.73%1999: 20.34%2000: 17.28%2001: 22.15%2002: 24.47%2003: 26.53%2004: 24.37%2005: 22.36%2006: 20.16%2007: 19.72%2008: 19.42%2009: 19.78%2010: 21.61%2011: 21.58%2012: 21.17%2013: 21.22%2014: 21.35%2015: 21.61%2016: 21.84%2017: 21.99%2018: 21.77%2019: 22.01%2020: 22.67%2021: 26.23%2022: 26.06%2023: 27.07%2024: 27.57%2025: 27.88%
Change over the period: +10.84 pp Annual average: 0.32 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Botswana

Botswana 27.88%
World 4.94%
Southern Africa computed 32.74%
Female unemployment — Botswana, by year Botswana All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 27.88 +0.32 pp
2024 27.57 +0.5 pp
2023 27.07 +1.01 pp
2022 26.06 −0.17 pp
2021 26.23 +3.55 pp
2020 22.67 +0.66 pp
2019 22.01 +0.24 pp
2018 21.77 −0.23 pp
2017 21.99 +0.15 pp
2016 21.84 +0.23 pp
2015 21.61 +0.25 pp
2014 21.35 +0.13 pp
2013 21.22 +0.05 pp
2012 21.17 −0.4 pp
2011 21.58 −0.04 pp
2010 21.61 +1.83 pp
2009 19.78 +0.37 pp
2008 19.42 −0.3 pp
2007 19.72 −0.44 pp
2006 20.16 −2.2 pp
2005 22.36 −2.01 pp
2004 24.37 −2.17 pp
2003 26.53 +2.07 pp
2002 24.47 +2.31 pp
2001 22.15 +4.87 pp
2000 17.28 −3.06 pp
1999 20.34 −3.39 pp
1998 23.73 −0.01 pp
1997 23.74 −0.45 pp
1996 24.19 +0.58 pp
1995 23.61 +0.58 pp
1994 23.03 +1.95 pp
1993 21.08 +1.96 pp
1992 19.12 +2.08 pp
1991 17.04

Southern Africa, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.