Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Estonia

Female unemployment in Estonia in 2025 — 8.03%. Ranked 126 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 6.5 pp.

2025 8.03% +0.48 pp vs 2024
World rank 126of 182
Period maximum 14.09%2010
Period minimum 1.53%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Estonia, 1991–202505101519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 1.53%1992: 3.46%1993: 6.64%1994: 7.93%1995: 8.86%1996: 9.22%1997: 9.54%1998: 8.5%1999: 10.13%2000: 11.61%2001: 13.24%2002: 8.68%2003: 10.38%2004: 8.83%2005: 6.91%2006: 5.59%2007: 3.76%2008: 5.14%2009: 10.3%2010: 14.09%2011: 11.58%2012: 9.1%2013: 8.16%2014: 6.81%2015: 6.32%2016: 6.16%2017: 5.24%2018: 5.26%2019: 4.93%2020: 6.77%2021: 5.54%2022: 5.06%2023: 6.64%2024: 7.55%2025: 8.03%
Change over the period: +6.5 pp Annual average: 0.19 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Estonia

Estonia 8.03%
World 4.94%
Northern Europe computed 5.25%
High-income countries computed 4.72%
Female unemployment — Estonia, by year Estonia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 8.03 +0.48 pp
2024 7.55 +0.91 pp
2023 6.64 +1.58 pp
2022 5.06 −0.48 pp
2021 5.54 −1.23 pp
2020 6.77 +1.85 pp
2019 4.93 −0.33 pp
2018 5.26 +0.01 pp
2017 5.24 −0.92 pp
2016 6.16 −0.16 pp
2015 6.32 −0.49 pp
2014 6.81 −1.34 pp
2013 8.16 −0.94 pp
2012 9.1 −2.48 pp
2011 11.58 −2.51 pp
2010 14.09 +3.79 pp
2009 10.3 +5.16 pp
2008 5.14 +1.38 pp
2007 3.76 −1.83 pp
2006 5.59 −1.32 pp
2005 6.91 −1.92 pp
2004 8.83 −1.55 pp
2003 10.38 +1.7 pp
2002 8.68 −4.56 pp
2001 13.24 +1.63 pp
2000 11.61 +1.48 pp
1999 10.13 +1.63 pp
1998 8.5 −1.03 pp
1997 9.54 +0.31 pp
1996 9.22 +0.37 pp
1995 8.86 +0.93 pp
1994 7.93 +1.29 pp
1993 6.64 +3.18 pp
1992 3.46 +1.94 pp
1991 1.53

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.