Government health expenditure per capita — all countries

Government health expenditure per capita — Bosnia and Herzegovina

Government health expenditure per capita in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2023 — 520 US$. Ranked 69 in the world out of 191. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 853.8%.

2023 520 US$ +18.47% vs 2022
World rank 69of 191
Period maximum 520 US$2023
Period minimum 55 US$2000

Trend over time

2000–2023 · US$ per capita

Government health expenditure per capita — Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2000–202302004006002000200320062009201220152018202120232000: 55 US$2001: 60 US$2002: 71 US$2003: 111 US$2004: 127 US$2005: 132 US$2006: 153 US$2007: 201 US$2008: 256 US$2009: 278 US$2010: 276 US$2011: 309 US$2012: 305 US$2013: 331 US$2014: 347 US$2015: 298 US$2016: 319 US$2017: 331 US$2018: 370 US$2019: 376 US$2020: 414 US$2021: 476 US$2022: 439 US$2023: 520 US$
Change over the period: +466 (+853.8%) Average annual rate: 10.3 %

Comparison, 2023

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina 520 US$
World 804 US$
Southern Europe computed 1,999 US$
Government health expenditure per capita — Bosnia and Herzegovina, by year Bosnia and Herzegovina All countries CSV XLSX
Year US$ Change Change, %
2023 520 +81 +18.47%
2022 439 −37 −7.79%
2021 476 +62 +15%
2020 414 +38 +10.24%
2019 376 +5 +1.44%
2018 370 +40 +12%
2017 331 +11 +3.5%
2016 319 +21 +7.09%
2015 298 −49 −14.05%
2014 347 +16 +4.76%
2013 331 +26 +8.43%
2012 305 −4 −1.23%
2011 309 +33 +11.86%
2010 276 −2 −0.73%
2009 278 +23 +8.88%
2008 256 +54 +27.03%
2007 201 +48 +31.19%
2006 153 +22 +16.37%
2005 132 +5 +4.17%
2004 127 +15 +13.62%
2003 111 +40 +56.86%
2002 71 +11 +18.54%
2001 60 +5 +9.9%
2000 55

About the indicator

Government spending on health in current US dollars per person. Of all the spending indicators this one separates countries the most: the gap between the top and the bottom of the table exceeds a factor of a thousand, whereas by share of GDP it is rarely more than fivefold. The reason is simple — the share is taken from economies of very different size.

Important: Converted at the market exchange rate rather than by purchasing power: the real volume of medical care one dollar buys in low-income countries is markedly larger, so the gap in the table overstates the gap in services.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.