Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Uruguay

Bank branches in Uruguay in 2024 — 8.6 per 100k. Ranked 100 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 33.5%.

2024 8.6 per 100k −4.83% vs 2023
World rank 100of 153
Period maximum 13.77 per 100k2010
Period minimum 8.6 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Uruguay, 2004–20248101214200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 12.94 per 100k2005: 12.89 per 100k2006: 13.48 per 100k2007: 13.61 per 100k2008: 13.74 per 100k2009: 13.58 per 100k2010: 13.77 per 100k2011: 13.72 per 100k2012: 12.91 per 100k2013: 12.76 per 100k2014: 12.38 per 100k2015: 12.16 per 100k2016: 11.61 per 100k2017: 11.14 per 100k2018: 10.19 per 100k2019: 9.99 per 100k2020: 10.16 per 100k2021: 9.79 per 100k2022: 9.66 per 100k2023: 9.04 per 100k2024: 8.6 per 100k
Change over the period: −4.34 (−33.53%) Average annual rate: -2.02 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Uruguay

Uruguay 8.6 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Latin America & Caribbean 11.58 per 100k
South America computed 14.52 per 100k
Bank branches — Uruguay, by year Uruguay All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 8.6 −0.44 −4.83%
2023 9.04 −0.62 −6.4%
2022 9.66 −0.14 −1.4%
2021 9.79 −0.37 −3.64%
2020 10.16 +0.17 +1.69%
2019 9.99 −0.2 −1.92%
2018 10.19 −0.95 −8.51%
2017 11.14 −0.47 −4.07%
2016 11.61 −0.55 −4.54%
2015 12.16 −0.22 −1.79%
2014 12.38 −0.38 −2.96%
2013 12.76 −0.15 −1.17%
2012 12.91 −0.81 −5.9%
2011 13.72 −0.04 −0.32%
2010 13.77 +0.19 +1.38%
2009 13.58 −0.16 −1.15%
2008 13.74 +0.12 +0.91%
2007 13.61 +0.13 +0.99%
2006 13.48 +0.58 +4.53%
2005 12.89 −0.05 −0.35%
2004 12.94

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.