Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Chile

Bank branches in Chile in 2024 — 8.9 per 100k. Ranked 97 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 39.3%.

2024 8.9 per 100k −5.07% vs 2023
World rank 97of 153
Period maximum 17.12 per 100k2010
Period minimum 8.9 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Chile, 2004–20247.51012.51517.5200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 14.67 per 100k2005: 15.12 per 100k2006: 16.32 per 100k2007: 16.89 per 100k2008: 17.09 per 100k2009: 16.71 per 100k2010: 17.12 per 100k2011: 17.01 per 100k2012: 16.94 per 100k2013: 16.78 per 100k2014: 16.58 per 100k2015: 15.89 per 100k2016: 15.54 per 100k2017: 14.6 per 100k2018: 13.72 per 100k2019: 12.76 per 100k2020: 12.02 per 100k2021: 10.88 per 100k2022: 9.97 per 100k2023: 9.38 per 100k2024: 8.9 per 100k
Change over the period: −5.77 (−39.31%) Average annual rate: -2.47 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Chile

Chile 8.9 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Latin America & Caribbean 11.58 per 100k
South America computed 14.52 per 100k
Bank branches — Chile, by year Chile All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 8.9 −0.48 −5.07%
2023 9.38 −0.59 −5.93%
2022 9.97 −0.91 −8.39%
2021 10.88 −1.14 −9.49%
2020 12.02 −0.73 −5.76%
2019 12.76 −0.96 −7%
2018 13.72 −0.88 −6.06%
2017 14.6 −0.94 −6.05%
2016 15.54 −0.35 −2.19%
2015 15.89 −0.69 −4.14%
2014 16.58 −0.2 −1.21%
2013 16.78 −0.16 −0.92%
2012 16.94 −0.08 −0.46%
2011 17.01 −0.11 −0.63%
2010 17.12 +0.41 +2.46%
2009 16.71 −0.38 −2.24%
2008 17.09 +0.2 +1.17%
2007 16.89 +0.57 +3.49%
2006 16.32 +1.21 +7.98%
2005 15.12 +0.45 +3.06%
2004 14.67

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.