Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Peru

Bank branches in Peru in 2024 — 4.49 per 100k. Ranked 127 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has risen by 7.8%.

2024 4.49 per 100k −5.48% vs 2023
World rank 127of 153
Period maximum 8.31 per 100k2015
Period minimum 4.16 per 100k2004

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Peru, 2004–202446810200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 4.16 per 100k2005: 4.29 per 100k2006: 4.45 per 100k2007: 5.12 per 100k2008: 6.61 per 100k2009: 6.72 per 100k2010: 6.83 per 100k2011: 7.08 per 100k2012: 7.7 per 100k2013: 7.86 per 100k2014: 8.18 per 100k2015: 8.31 per 100k2016: 8.13 per 100k2017: 7.68 per 100k2018: 7.29 per 100k2019: 6.63 per 100k2020: 6.09 per 100k2021: 5.41 per 100k2022: 5.18 per 100k2023: 4.75 per 100k2024: 4.49 per 100k
Change over the period: +0.33 (+7.84%) Average annual rate: 0.38 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Peru

Peru 4.49 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Latin America & Caribbean 11.58 per 100k
South America computed 14.52 per 100k
Upper-middle-income countries computed 10.22 per 100k
Bank branches — Peru, by year Peru All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 4.49 −0.26 −5.48%
2023 4.75 −0.43 −8.33%
2022 5.18 −0.23 −4.24%
2021 5.41 −0.68 −11.16%
2020 6.09 −0.54 −8.13%
2019 6.63 −0.66 −9.11%
2018 7.29 −0.39 −5.02%
2017 7.68 −0.45 −5.53%
2016 8.13 −0.18 −2.18%
2015 8.31 +0.13 +1.63%
2014 8.18 +0.31 +3.99%
2013 7.86 +0.16 +2.08%
2012 7.7 +0.62 +8.77%
2011 7.08 +0.26 +3.78%
2010 6.83 +0.1 +1.5%
2009 6.72 +0.11 +1.71%
2008 6.61 +1.5 +29.24%
2007 5.12 +0.66 +14.87%
2006 4.45 +0.17 +3.93%
2005 4.29 +0.12 +2.93%
2004 4.16

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.