Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Timor-Leste

Bank branches in Timor-Leste in 2023 — 5.27 per 100k. Ranked 128 in the world out of 158. Since 2004, the indicator has risen by 373.1%.

2023 5.27 per 100k −1.99% vs 2022
World rank 128of 158
Period maximum 6.06 per 100k2019
Period minimum 1.11 per 100k2004

Trend over time

2004–2023 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Timor-Leste, 2004–202302468200420062008201020122014201620182020202220232004: 1.11 per 100k2005: 2 per 100k2006: 1.95 per 100k2007: 1.9 per 100k2008: 1.84 per 100k2009: 1.79 per 100k2010: 1.74 per 100k2011: 3.83 per 100k2012: 4.17 per 100k2013: 4.78 per 100k2014: 4.92 per 100k2015: 4.91 per 100k2016: 4.76 per 100k2017: 5.01 per 100k2018: 5.86 per 100k2019: 6.06 per 100k2020: 5.54 per 100k2021: 5.39 per 100k2022: 5.38 per 100k2023: 5.27 per 100k
Change over the period: +4.16 (+373.14%) Average annual rate: 8.52 %

Comparison, 2023

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste 5.27 per 100k
World 10.72 per 100k
East Asia & Pacific 10.16 per 100k
South-Eastern Asia computed 9.05 per 100k
Lower-middle-income countries computed 11.92 per 100k
Bank branches — Timor-Leste, by year Timor-Leste All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2023 5.27 −0.11 −1.99%
2022 5.38 −0.01 −0.23%
2021 5.39 −0.15 −2.65%
2020 5.54 −0.52 −8.6%
2019 6.06 +0.2 +3.37%
2018 5.86 +0.85 +17.06%
2017 5.01 +0.25 +5.18%
2016 4.76 −0.15 −2.97%
2015 4.91 −0.01 −0.22%
2014 4.92 +0.14 +2.92%
2013 4.78 +0.6 +14.47%
2012 4.17 +0.34 +8.88%
2011 3.83 +2.1 +120.91%
2010 1.74 −0.05 −2.91%
2009 1.79 −0.05 −2.94%
2008 1.84 −0.05 −2.86%
2007 1.9 −0.05 −2.72%
2006 1.95 −0.05 −2.63%
2005 2 +0.89 +79.64%
2004 1.11

South-Eastern Asia, 2023

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.