Freshwater withdrawal — all countries

Freshwater withdrawal — Sao Tome and Principe

Freshwater withdrawal in Sao Tome and Principe in 2022 — 0.04 km³. Ranked 167 in the world out of 179. Since 1993, the indicator has risen by 484.3%.

2022 0 km³ +0% vs 2021
World rank 167of 179
Period maximum 0 km³2016
Period minimum 0 km³1993

Trend over time

1993–2022 · km³ per year

Freshwater withdrawal — Sao Tome and Principe, 1993–20220000199319961999200220052008201120142017202020221993: 0.01 km³1994: 0.01 km³1995: 0.01 km³1996: 0.01 km³1997: 0.01 km³1998: 0.01 km³1999: 0.02 km³2000: 0.02 km³2001: 0.02 km³2002: 0.02 km³2003: 0.02 km³2004: 0.02 km³2005: 0.02 km³2006: 0.03 km³2007: 0.03 km³2008: 0.03 km³2009: 0.03 km³2010: 0.03 km³2011: 0.03 km³2012: 0.04 km³2013: 0.04 km³2014: 0.04 km³2015: 0.04 km³2016: 0.04 km³2017: 0.04 km³2018: 0.04 km³2019: 0.04 km³2020: 0.04 km³2021: 0.04 km³2022: 0.04 km³
Change over the period: +0 (+484.29%) Average annual rate: 6.28 %

Comparison, 2022

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Sao Tome and Principe

Sao Tome and Principe 0 km³
World 3,853 km³
Middle Africa computed 4 km³
Lower-middle-income countries computed 1,401 km³
Freshwater withdrawal — Sao Tome and Principe, by year Sao Tome and Principe All countries CSV XLSX
Year km³ Change Change, %
2022 0 +0 +0%
2021 0 +0 +0%
2020 0 +0 +0%
2019 0 +0 +0%
2018 0 +0 +0%
2017 0 +0 +0%
2016 0 +0 +3.74%
2015 0 +0 +3.88%
2014 0 +0 +4.04%
2013 0 +0 +4.21%
2012 0 +0 +4.4%
2011 0 +0 +4.6%
2010 0 +0 +4.82%
2009 0 +0 +5.06%
2008 0 +0 +5.33%
2007 0 +0 +5.63%
2006 0 +0 +5.97%
2005 0 +0 +6.35%
2004 0 +0 +6.78%
2003 0 +0 +7.27%
2002 0 +0 +7.84%
2001 0 +0 +8.51%
2000 0 +0 +9.3%
1999 0 +0 +10.26%
1998 0 +0 +11.43%
1997 0 +0 +12.9%
1996 0 +0 +14.82%
1995 0 +0 +17.39%
1994 0 +0 +21.06%
1993 0

About the indicator

Annual freshwater withdrawal for all uses: irrigation, industry, municipal supply. More than two-thirds of global withdrawal goes to agriculture, so the volume is tied more closely to the area under irrigation than to the number of residents or the size of industry. Withdrawal is not consumption: part of the water returns to water bodies, though usually in worse condition.

Important: Withdrawal, not consumptive use. It can exceed a country's own renewable resources: the country then takes water from across the border, from non-renewable groundwater, or desalinates it.

Source: FAOSTAT (FAO), license CC BY 4.0.