Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Zimbabwe

Safely managed drinking water in Zimbabwe in 2024 — 25.5%. Ranked 132 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has fallen by 3.9 pp.

2024 25.5% −0.2 pp vs 2023
World rank 132of 148
Period maximum 29.8%2004
Period minimum 25.5%2024

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Zimbabwe, 2000–2024242628302000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 29.4%2001: 29.5%2002: 29.8%2003: 29.8%2004: 29.8%2005: 29.6%2006: 29.4%2007: 29.2%2008: 28.9%2009: 28.7%2010: 28.5%2011: 28.2%2012: 28%2013: 27.7%2014: 27.5%2015: 27.2%2016: 27%2017: 26.8%2018: 26.6%2019: 26.4%2020: 26.2%2021: 26%2022: 25.8%2023: 25.6%2024: 25.5%
Change over the period: −3.9 pp Annual average: -0.16 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe 25.5%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Zimbabwe, by year Zimbabwe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 25.5 −0.2 pp
2023 25.6 −0.2 pp
2022 25.8 −0.2 pp
2021 26 −0.2 pp
2020 26.2 −0.2 pp
2019 26.4 −0.2 pp
2018 26.6 −0.2 pp
2017 26.8 −0.2 pp
2016 27 −0.2 pp
2015 27.2 −0.2 pp
2014 27.5 −0.2 pp
2013 27.7 −0.3 pp
2012 28 −0.2 pp
2011 28.2 −0.2 pp
2010 28.5 −0.2 pp
2009 28.7 −0.2 pp
2008 28.9 −0.2 pp
2007 29.2 −0.2 pp
2006 29.4 −0.2 pp
2005 29.6 −0.2 pp
2004 29.8 +0 pp
2003 29.8 +0.1 pp
2002 29.8 +0.2 pp
2001 29.5 +0.2 pp
2000 29.4

Eastern Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.