Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Suriname

Safely managed drinking water in Suriname in 2024 — 55.8%. Ranked 105 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 4.3 pp.

2024 55.8% +0 pp vs 2023
World rank 105of 148
Period maximum 55.8%2024
Period minimum 51.6%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Suriname, 2000–2024505254562000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 51.6%2001: 51.8%2002: 52.1%2003: 52.3%2004: 52.5%2005: 52.7%2006: 52.9%2007: 53.1%2008: 53.3%2009: 53.5%2010: 53.7%2011: 53.9%2012: 54.1%2013: 54.3%2014: 54.5%2015: 54.7%2016: 54.9%2017: 55.1%2018: 55.3%2019: 55.5%2020: 55.8%2021: 55.8%2022: 55.8%2023: 55.8%2024: 55.8%
Change over the period: +4.3 pp Annual average: 0.18 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Suriname

Suriname 55.8%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Suriname, by year Suriname All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 55.8 +0 pp
2023 55.8 +0 pp
2022 55.8 +0 pp
2021 55.8 +0 pp
2020 55.8 +0.2 pp
2019 55.5 +0.2 pp
2018 55.3 +0.2 pp
2017 55.1 +0.2 pp
2016 54.9 +0.2 pp
2015 54.7 +0.2 pp
2014 54.5 +0.2 pp
2013 54.3 +0.2 pp
2012 54.1 +0.2 pp
2011 53.9 +0.2 pp
2010 53.7 +0.2 pp
2009 53.5 +0.2 pp
2008 53.3 +0.2 pp
2007 53.1 +0.2 pp
2006 52.9 +0.2 pp
2005 52.7 +0.2 pp
2004 52.5 +0.2 pp
2003 52.3 +0.2 pp
2002 52.1 +0.2 pp
2001 51.8 +0.2 pp
2000 51.6

South America, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.