Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Dominican Republic

Safely managed drinking water in the Dominican Republic in 2024 — 45.3%. Ranked 113 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 3.3 pp.

2024 45.3% +0.1 pp vs 2023
World rank 113of 148
Period maximum 45.3%2024
Period minimum 42.1%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Dominican Republic, 2000–202442434445462000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 42.1%2001: 42.2%2002: 42.3%2003: 42.5%2004: 42.7%2005: 42.9%2006: 43.1%2007: 43.3%2008: 43.5%2009: 43.7%2010: 43.8%2011: 44%2012: 44.1%2013: 44.2%2014: 44.4%2015: 44.5%2016: 44.6%2017: 44.7%2018: 44.8%2019: 44.9%2020: 45%2021: 45.1%2022: 45.2%2023: 45.3%2024: 45.3%
Change over the period: +3.3 pp Annual average: 0.14 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Dominican Republic

Dominican Republic 45.3%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Dominican Republic, by year Dominican Republic All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 45.3 +0.1 pp
2023 45.3 +0.1 pp
2022 45.2 +0.1 pp
2021 45.1 +0.1 pp
2020 45 +0.1 pp
2019 44.9 +0.1 pp
2018 44.8 +0.1 pp
2017 44.7 +0.1 pp
2016 44.6 +0.1 pp
2015 44.5 +0.1 pp
2014 44.4 +0.1 pp
2013 44.2 +0.1 pp
2012 44.1 +0.1 pp
2011 44 +0.1 pp
2010 43.8 +0.2 pp
2009 43.7 +0.2 pp
2008 43.5 +0.2 pp
2007 43.3 +0.2 pp
2006 43.1 +0.2 pp
2005 42.9 +0.2 pp
2004 42.7 +0.2 pp
2003 42.5 +0.2 pp
2002 42.3 +0.1 pp
2001 42.2 +0.1 pp
2000 42.1

Caribbean, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.