Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Côte d'Ivoire

Safely managed drinking water in Côte d'Ivoire in 2024 — 36.4%. Ranked 121 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 11.1 pp.

2024 36.4% +0.2 pp vs 2023
World rank 121of 148
Period maximum 38.9%2021
Period minimum 25.4%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Côte d'Ivoire, 2000–2024253035402000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 25.4%2001: 25.9%2002: 26.4%2003: 26.9%2004: 27.4%2005: 27.9%2006: 28.3%2007: 28.8%2008: 29.3%2009: 29.8%2010: 30.3%2011: 30.8%2012: 31.9%2013: 33%2014: 34.2%2015: 35.3%2016: 36.5%2017: 37.7%2018: 38.2%2019: 38.4%2020: 38.7%2021: 38.9%2022: 37.7%2023: 36.2%2024: 36.4%
Change over the period: +11.1 pp Annual average: 0.46 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Côte d'Ivoire

Côte d'Ivoire 36.4%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Côte d'Ivoire, by year Côte d'Ivoire All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 36.4 +0.2 pp
2023 36.2 −1.5 pp
2022 37.7 −1.2 pp
2021 38.9 +0.2 pp
2020 38.7 +0.2 pp
2019 38.4 +0.2 pp
2018 38.2 +0.6 pp
2017 37.7 +1.2 pp
2016 36.5 +1.2 pp
2015 35.3 +1.2 pp
2014 34.2 +1.1 pp
2013 33 +1.1 pp
2012 31.9 +1.1 pp
2011 30.8 +0.5 pp
2010 30.3 +0.5 pp
2009 29.8 +0.5 pp
2008 29.3 +0.5 pp
2007 28.8 +0.5 pp
2006 28.3 +0.5 pp
2005 27.9 +0.5 pp
2004 27.4 +0.5 pp
2003 26.9 +0.5 pp
2002 26.4 +0.5 pp
2001 25.9 +0.5 pp
2000 25.4

Western Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.