Safely managed drinking water — all countries

Safely managed drinking water — Costa Rica

Safely managed drinking water in Costa Rica in 2024 — 80.5%. Ranked 76 in the world out of 148. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 3.9 pp.

2024 80.5% −0 pp vs 2023
World rank 76of 148
Period maximum 80.5%2019
Period minimum 76.6%2000

Trend over time

2000–2024 · % of population

Safely managed drinking water — Costa Rica, 2000–20247677787980812000200320062009201220152018202120242000: 76.6%2001: 76.9%2002: 77.2%2003: 77.5%2004: 77.8%2005: 78%2006: 78.3%2007: 78.5%2008: 78.8%2009: 79%2010: 79.2%2011: 79.4%2012: 79.6%2013: 79.7%2014: 79.9%2015: 80%2016: 80.2%2017: 80.3%2018: 80.4%2019: 80.5%2020: 80.5%2021: 80.5%2022: 80.5%2023: 80.5%2024: 80.5%
Change over the period: +3.9 pp Annual average: 0.16 pp

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Costa Rica

Costa Rica 80.5%
World 73.7%
Safely managed drinking water — Costa Rica, by year Costa Rica All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2024 80.5 −0 pp
2023 80.5 −0 pp
2022 80.5 −0 pp
2021 80.5 −0 pp
2020 80.5 −0 pp
2019 80.5 +0.1 pp
2018 80.4 +0.1 pp
2017 80.3 +0.1 pp
2016 80.2 +0.1 pp
2015 80 +0.2 pp
2014 79.9 +0.2 pp
2013 79.7 +0.2 pp
2012 79.6 +0.2 pp
2011 79.4 +0.2 pp
2010 79.2 +0.2 pp
2009 79 +0.2 pp
2008 78.8 +0.2 pp
2007 78.5 +0.2 pp
2006 78.3 +0.3 pp
2005 78 +0.3 pp
2004 77.8 +0.3 pp
2003 77.5 +0.3 pp
2002 77.2 +0.3 pp
2001 76.9 +0.3 pp
2000 76.6

Central America, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the population with safely managed drinking water — the top rung of the WHO and UNICEF ladder. Three requirements at once: the source is improved and located in the dwelling or on the plot, water is available when it is needed, and it is free of contamination. It is this indicator that is written into Sustainable Development Goal 6.1, whereas the better-known “basic access” requires only an improved source within half an hour's walk — the gap between the two measures in some countries exceeds forty percentage points.

Important: Stricter than basic access on three counts at once. There are fewer territories than for the basic indicator: testing for contamination requires laboratory data, which are not available everywhere.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.