Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Tonga

Youth unemployment in Tonga in 2025 — 6.03%. Ranked 33 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 2.95 pp.

2025 6.03% +0.04 pp vs 2024
World rank 33of 182
Period maximum 13.87%2003
Period minimum 2.91%2006

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Tonga, 1991–202505101519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 3.08%1992: 3.18%1993: 3.2%1994: 4.25%1995: 5.09%1996: 6.15%1997: 7.32%1998: 8.52%1999: 9.51%2000: 10.39%2001: 11.51%2002: 12.51%2003: 13.87%2004: 10.4%2005: 6.79%2006: 2.91%2007: 3.25%2008: 3.51%2009: 3.9%2010: 4.19%2011: 4.49%2012: 4.71%2013: 5.05%2014: 5.5%2015: 5.83%2016: 6.01%2017: 6.32%2018: 6.68%2019: 6.47%2020: 7.99%2021: 6.38%2022: 6.15%2023: 4.63%2024: 5.99%2025: 6.03%
Change over the period: +2.95 pp Annual average: 0.09 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Tonga

Tonga 6.03%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Tonga, by year Tonga All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.03 +0.04 pp
2024 5.99 +1.35 pp
2023 4.63 −1.52 pp
2022 6.15 −0.23 pp
2021 6.38 −1.62 pp
2020 7.99 +1.52 pp
2019 6.47 −0.21 pp
2018 6.68 +0.36 pp
2017 6.32 +0.31 pp
2016 6.01 +0.18 pp
2015 5.83 +0.33 pp
2014 5.5 +0.45 pp
2013 5.05 +0.35 pp
2012 4.71 +0.22 pp
2011 4.49 +0.3 pp
2010 4.19 +0.28 pp
2009 3.9 +0.39 pp
2008 3.51 +0.26 pp
2007 3.25 +0.34 pp
2006 2.91 −3.88 pp
2005 6.79 −3.61 pp
2004 10.4 −3.47 pp
2003 13.87 +1.36 pp
2002 12.51 +1 pp
2001 11.51 +1.13 pp
2000 10.39 +0.88 pp
1999 9.51 +0.98 pp
1998 8.52 +1.2 pp
1997 7.32 +1.17 pp
1996 6.15 +1.06 pp
1995 5.09 +0.84 pp
1994 4.25 +1.06 pp
1993 3.2 +0.01 pp
1992 3.18 +0.11 pp
1991 3.08

Polynesia, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.