Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Tonga

Female unemployment in Tonga in 2025 — 2.54%. Ranked 26 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 0.55 pp.

2025 2.54% +0.07 pp vs 2024
World rank 26of 182
Period maximum 7.41%2003
Period minimum 1.55%2006

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Tonga, 1991–20250246819911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 1.98%1992: 1.97%1993: 1.88%1994: 2.42%1995: 2.85%1996: 3.44%1997: 4.12%1998: 4.79%1999: 5.28%2000: 5.68%2001: 6.25%2002: 6.7%2003: 7.41%2004: 5.54%2005: 3.63%2006: 1.55%2007: 1.72%2008: 1.82%2009: 2.01%2010: 2.13%2011: 2.25%2012: 2.31%2013: 2.47%2014: 2.69%2015: 2.84%2016: 2.87%2017: 2.99%2018: 3.13%2019: 2.91%2020: 3.66%2021: 2.53%2022: 2.54%2023: 2.31%2024: 2.47%2025: 2.54%
Change over the period: +0.55 pp Annual average: 0.02 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Tonga

Tonga 2.54%
World 4.94%
Female unemployment — Tonga, by year Tonga All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 2.54 +0.07 pp
2024 2.47 +0.16 pp
2023 2.31 −0.23 pp
2022 2.54 +0.01 pp
2021 2.53 −1.13 pp
2020 3.66 +0.75 pp
2019 2.91 −0.23 pp
2018 3.13 +0.14 pp
2017 2.99 +0.12 pp
2016 2.87 +0.03 pp
2015 2.84 +0.15 pp
2014 2.69 +0.23 pp
2013 2.47 +0.15 pp
2012 2.31 +0.06 pp
2011 2.25 +0.13 pp
2010 2.13 +0.11 pp
2009 2.01 +0.2 pp
2008 1.82 +0.1 pp
2007 1.72 +0.17 pp
2006 1.55 −2.07 pp
2005 3.63 −1.91 pp
2004 5.54 −1.87 pp
2003 7.41 +0.71 pp
2002 6.7 +0.45 pp
2001 6.25 +0.57 pp
2000 5.68 +0.4 pp
1999 5.28 +0.49 pp
1998 4.79 +0.67 pp
1997 4.12 +0.67 pp
1996 3.44 +0.6 pp
1995 2.85 +0.43 pp
1994 2.42 +0.54 pp
1993 1.88 −0.09 pp
1992 1.97 −0.02 pp
1991 1.98

Polynesia, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.