Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Malaysia

Youth unemployment in Malaysia in 2025 — 11.95%. Ranked 89 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 1.14 pp.

2025 11.95% −0.3 pp vs 2024
World rank 89of 182
Period maximum 12.37%2020
Period minimum 7.79%1997

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Malaysia, 1991–20256810121419911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 10.81%1992: 10.99%1993: 12.35%1994: 11.1%1995: 9.75%1996: 7.84%1997: 7.79%1998: 10.09%1999: 10.86%2000: 9.6%2001: 11.4%2002: 11.19%2003: 11.49%2004: 11.36%2005: 11.33%2006: 10.68%2007: 10.76%2008: 10.59%2009: 11.24%2010: 10.87%2011: 9.82%2012: 10.14%2013: 10.07%2014: 9.77%2015: 10.98%2016: 10.84%2017: 11.28%2018: 11.4%2019: 11.21%2020: 12.37%2021: 11.58%2022: 12.16%2023: 12.15%2024: 12.25%2025: 11.95%
Change over the period: +1.14 pp Annual average: 0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Malaysia

Malaysia 11.95%
World 13.41%
South-Eastern Asia computed 9.26%
Youth unemployment — Malaysia, by year Malaysia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 11.95 −0.3 pp
2024 12.25 +0.1 pp
2023 12.15 −0.01 pp
2022 12.16 +0.58 pp
2021 11.58 −0.79 pp
2020 12.37 +1.15 pp
2019 11.21 −0.18 pp
2018 11.4 +0.12 pp
2017 11.28 +0.44 pp
2016 10.84 −0.14 pp
2015 10.98 +1.21 pp
2014 9.77 −0.3 pp
2013 10.07 −0.07 pp
2012 10.14 +0.32 pp
2011 9.82 −1.05 pp
2010 10.87 −0.36 pp
2009 11.24 +0.65 pp
2008 10.59 −0.17 pp
2007 10.76 +0.08 pp
2006 10.68 −0.64 pp
2005 11.33 −0.04 pp
2004 11.36 −0.13 pp
2003 11.49 +0.3 pp
2002 11.19 −0.21 pp
2001 11.4 +1.8 pp
2000 9.6 −1.26 pp
1999 10.86 +0.76 pp
1998 10.09 +2.31 pp
1997 7.79 −0.05 pp
1996 7.84 −1.92 pp
1995 9.75 −1.35 pp
1994 11.1 −1.26 pp
1993 12.35 +1.37 pp
1992 10.99 +0.18 pp
1991 10.81

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.