Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Indonesia

Youth unemployment in Indonesia in 2025 — 12.98%. Ranked 93 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 5.13 pp.

2025 12.98% −0.1 pp vs 2024
World rank 93of 182
Period maximum 26.3%2005
Period minimum 7.84%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Indonesia, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 7.84%1992: 8.22%1993: 8.55%1994: 13.08%1995: 13.99%1996: 14.93%1997: 14.94%1998: 16.75%1999: 19.28%2000: 19.15%2001: 19.04%2002: 21.43%2003: 21.44%2004: 23.62%2005: 26.3%2006: 24.62%2007: 22.86%2008: 19.64%2009: 19.11%2010: 17.69%2011: 18.39%2012: 15.67%2013: 15.98%2014: 15.98%2015: 17.22%2016: 16%2017: 14.55%2018: 16.37%2019: 13.58%2020: 14.77%2021: 13.8%2022: 14.05%2023: 13.02%2024: 13.08%2025: 12.98%
Change over the period: +5.13 pp Annual average: 0.15 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Indonesia

Indonesia 12.98%
World 13.41%
South-Eastern Asia computed 9.26%
Youth unemployment — Indonesia, by year Indonesia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 12.98 −0.1 pp
2024 13.08 +0.06 pp
2023 13.02 −1.04 pp
2022 14.05 +0.25 pp
2021 13.8 −0.97 pp
2020 14.77 +1.2 pp
2019 13.58 −2.79 pp
2018 16.37 +1.82 pp
2017 14.55 −1.44 pp
2016 16 −1.23 pp
2015 17.22 +1.25 pp
2014 15.98 +0 pp
2013 15.98 +0.3 pp
2012 15.67 −2.72 pp
2011 18.39 +0.7 pp
2010 17.69 −1.42 pp
2009 19.11 −0.54 pp
2008 19.64 −3.22 pp
2007 22.86 −1.76 pp
2006 24.62 −1.69 pp
2005 26.3 +2.69 pp
2004 23.62 +2.18 pp
2003 21.44 +0 pp
2002 21.43 +2.4 pp
2001 19.04 −0.11 pp
2000 19.15 −0.13 pp
1999 19.28 +2.53 pp
1998 16.75 +1.8 pp
1997 14.94 +0.01 pp
1996 14.93 +0.94 pp
1995 13.99 +0.91 pp
1994 13.08 +4.54 pp
1993 8.55 +0.32 pp
1992 8.22 +0.38 pp
1991 7.84

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.