Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Japan

Youth unemployment in Japan in 2025 — 3.9%. Ranked 19 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 0.56 pp.

2025 3.9% −0.03 pp vs 2024
World rank 19of 182
Period maximum 10.2%2003
Period minimum 3.67%2018

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Japan, 1991–20252468101219911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 4.46%1992: 4.35%1993: 5.11%1994: 5.45%1995: 6.1%1996: 6.73%1997: 6.65%1998: 7.73%1999: 9.3%2000: 9.21%2001: 9.6%2002: 10.06%2003: 10.2%2004: 9.57%2005: 8.71%2006: 8.3%2007: 7.87%2008: 7.31%2009: 9.21%2010: 9.46%2011: 8.33%2012: 8.24%2013: 6.81%2014: 6.3%2015: 5.47%2016: 5.12%2017: 4.61%2018: 3.67%2019: 3.94%2020: 4.68%2021: 4.71%2022: 4.43%2023: 4.12%2024: 3.93%2025: 3.9%
Change over the period: −0.56 pp Annual average: -0.02 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Japan

Japan 3.9%
World 13.41%
Eastern Asia computed 14.37%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Japan, by year Japan All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 3.9 −0.03 pp
2024 3.93 −0.19 pp
2023 4.12 −0.32 pp
2022 4.43 −0.27 pp
2021 4.71 +0.03 pp
2020 4.68 +0.74 pp
2019 3.94 +0.27 pp
2018 3.67 −0.94 pp
2017 4.61 −0.51 pp
2016 5.12 −0.35 pp
2015 5.47 −0.83 pp
2014 6.3 −0.51 pp
2013 6.81 −1.43 pp
2012 8.24 −0.09 pp
2011 8.33 −1.14 pp
2010 9.46 +0.26 pp
2009 9.21 +1.89 pp
2008 7.31 −0.56 pp
2007 7.87 −0.43 pp
2006 8.3 −0.4 pp
2005 8.71 −0.87 pp
2004 9.57 −0.63 pp
2003 10.2 +0.14 pp
2002 10.06 +0.46 pp
2001 9.6 +0.39 pp
2000 9.21 −0.09 pp
1999 9.3 +1.57 pp
1998 7.73 +1.08 pp
1997 6.65 −0.08 pp
1996 6.73 +0.64 pp
1995 6.1 +0.65 pp
1994 5.45 +0.35 pp
1993 5.11 +0.75 pp
1992 4.35 −0.11 pp
1991 4.46

Eastern Asia, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.