Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Eastern Asia

Youth unemployment in Eastern Asia in 2025 — 14.37%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 9.89 pp.

2025 14.37% +0.65 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 14.37%2025
Period minimum 4.47%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Eastern Asia, 1991–202505101519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 4.47%1992: 4.53%1993: 5.23%1994: 5.66%1995: 5.96%1996: 6.3%1997: 6.6%1998: 7.04%1999: 7.23%2000: 7.17%2001: 8.18%2002: 8.99%2003: 9.66%2004: 9.44%2005: 9.41%2006: 9.22%2007: 9.06%2008: 9.54%2009: 10.02%2010: 9.73%2011: 9.76%2012: 9.89%2013: 9.96%2014: 10.08%2015: 10.22%2016: 10.12%2017: 9.93%2018: 9.2%2019: 10.08%2020: 11.88%2021: 11.6%2022: 13.46%2023: 14.15%2024: 13.71%2025: 14.37%
Change over the period: +9.89 pp Annual average: 0.29 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Eastern Asia

Eastern Asia 14.37%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Eastern Asia, by year Eastern Asia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 14.37 +0.65 pp
2024 13.71 −0.44 pp
2023 14.15 +0.69 pp
2022 13.46 +1.85 pp
2021 11.6 −0.28 pp
2020 11.88 +1.8 pp
2019 10.08 +0.88 pp
2018 9.2 −0.73 pp
2017 9.93 −0.19 pp
2016 10.12 −0.1 pp
2015 10.22 +0.14 pp
2014 10.08 +0.12 pp
2013 9.96 +0.08 pp
2012 9.89 +0.13 pp
2011 9.76 +0.03 pp
2010 9.73 −0.28 pp
2009 10.02 +0.48 pp
2008 9.54 +0.48 pp
2007 9.06 −0.16 pp
2006 9.22 −0.19 pp
2005 9.41 −0.03 pp
2004 9.44 −0.22 pp
2003 9.66 +0.67 pp
2002 8.99 +0.81 pp
2001 8.18 +1.01 pp
2000 7.17 −0.06 pp
1999 7.23 +0.19 pp
1998 7.04 +0.44 pp
1997 6.6 +0.3 pp
1996 6.3 +0.35 pp
1995 5.96 +0.3 pp
1994 5.66 +0.43 pp
1993 5.23 +0.7 pp
1992 4.53 +0.06 pp
1991 4.47

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.