Labor productivity in Poland in 2025 — 96,960 $/person. Ranked 37 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 225.9%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Poland
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96,960 | +3,992 | +4.29% |
| 2024 | 92,968 | +3,673 | +4.11% |
| 2023 | 89,295 | −181 | −0.2% |
| 2022 | 89,476 | +3,936 | +4.6% |
| 2021 | 85,540 | +4,961 | +6.16% |
| 2020 | 80,578 | −626 | −0.77% |
| 2019 | 81,204 | +3,307 | +4.25% |
| 2018 | 77,897 | +3,910 | +5.29% |
| 2017 | 73,987 | +2,405 | +3.36% |
| 2016 | 71,582 | +880 | +1.24% |
| 2015 | 70,703 | +1,936 | +2.82% |
| 2014 | 68,766 | +1,250 | +1.85% |
| 2013 | 67,516 | +707 | +1.06% |
| 2012 | 66,809 | +880 | +1.33% |
| 2011 | 65,930 | +3,065 | +4.88% |
| 2010 | 62,865 | +2,023 | +3.32% |
| 2009 | 60,843 | +1,279 | +2.15% |
| 2008 | 59,564 | +128 | +0.22% |
| 2007 | 59,435 | +1,002 | +1.71% |
| 2006 | 58,433 | +1,241 | +2.17% |
| 2005 | 57,192 | +449 | +0.79% |
| 2004 | 56,743 | +2,051 | +3.75% |
| 2003 | 54,693 | +1,723 | +3.25% |
| 2002 | 52,969 | +2,530 | +5.02% |
| 2001 | 50,439 | +1,613 | +3.3% |
| 2000 | 48,826 | +4,159 | +9.31% |
| 1999 | 44,667 | +3,196 | +7.71% |
| 1998 | 41,471 | +1,322 | +3.29% |
| 1997 | 40,149 | +1,905 | +4.98% |
| 1996 | 38,243 | +1,843 | +5.06% |
| 1995 | 36,400 | +2,547 | +7.52% |
| 1994 | 33,853 | +1,958 | +6.14% |
| 1993 | 31,895 | +1,482 | +4.87% |
| 1992 | 30,412 | +663 | +2.23% |
| 1991 | 29,750 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
