Labor productivity in Chad in 2025 — 7,805 $/person. Ranked 153 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 65.4%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Chad
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7,805 | +162 | +2.12% |
| 2024 | 7,643 | −92 | −1.19% |
| 2023 | 7,735 | −140 | −1.78% |
| 2022 | 7,875 | −91 | −1.14% |
| 2021 | 7,965 | −309 | −3.73% |
| 2020 | 8,274 | −192 | −2.27% |
| 2019 | 8,466 | +149 | +1.79% |
| 2018 | 8,318 | +231 | +2.86% |
| 2017 | 8,087 | −351 | −4.16% |
| 2016 | 8,438 | −563 | −6.25% |
| 2015 | 9,000 | +90 | +1% |
| 2014 | 8,911 | −78 | −0.86% |
| 2013 | 8,989 | −4 | −0.04% |
| 2012 | 8,992 | +511 | +6.02% |
| 2011 | 8,482 | +139 | +1.67% |
| 2010 | 8,343 | +812 | +10.79% |
| 2009 | 7,530 | −324 | −4.12% |
| 2008 | 7,854 | +30 | +0.38% |
| 2007 | 7,824 | +133 | +1.73% |
| 2006 | 7,691 | −251 | −3.17% |
| 2005 | 7,943 | +930 | +13.25% |
| 2004 | 7,013 | +1,528 | +27.87% |
| 2003 | 5,485 | +528 | +10.66% |
| 2002 | 4,956 | +270 | +5.76% |
| 2001 | 4,686 | +395 | +9.21% |
| 2000 | 4,291 | −143 | −3.23% |
| 1999 | 4,434 | −147 | −3.21% |
| 1998 | 4,581 | +199 | +4.54% |
| 1997 | 4,382 | +149 | +3.53% |
| 1996 | 4,233 | −78 | −1.81% |
| 1995 | 4,311 | −129 | −2.91% |
| 1994 | 4,440 | +389 | +9.59% |
| 1993 | 4,052 | −821 | −16.85% |
| 1992 | 4,872 | +153 | +3.24% |
| 1991 | 4,719 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
