Labor productivity in Cambodia in 2025 — 12,600 $/person. Ranked 140 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 103.2%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Cambodia
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12,600 | +445 | +3.67% |
| 2024 | 12,155 | +492 | +4.22% |
| 2023 | 11,663 | +357 | +3.16% |
| 2022 | 11,306 | −51 | −0.45% |
| 2021 | 11,357 | +525 | +4.85% |
| 2020 | 10,831 | −575 | −5.04% |
| 2019 | 11,406 | +604 | +5.6% |
| 2018 | 10,802 | +658 | +6.49% |
| 2017 | 10,144 | +593 | +6.21% |
| 2016 | 9,551 | +345 | +3.75% |
| 2015 | 9,206 | +526 | +6.06% |
| 2014 | 8,680 | +517 | +6.34% |
| 2013 | 8,162 | +708 | +9.49% |
| 2012 | 7,455 | +587 | +8.54% |
| 2011 | 6,868 | +254 | +3.84% |
| 2010 | 6,614 | −41 | −0.62% |
| 2009 | 6,655 | −190 | −2.78% |
| 2008 | 6,846 | +443 | +6.91% |
| 2007 | 6,403 | +414 | +6.91% |
| 2006 | 5,989 | +415 | +7.45% |
| 2005 | 5,574 | +494 | +9.73% |
| 2004 | 5,080 | +286 | +5.97% |
| 2003 | 4,794 | +311 | +6.93% |
| 2002 | 4,483 | +129 | +2.97% |
| 2001 | 4,354 | +163 | +3.89% |
| 2000 | 4,191 | +249 | +6.33% |
| 1999 | 3,941 | +329 | +9.1% |
| 1998 | 3,613 | −40 | −1.1% |
| 1997 | 3,653 | −174 | −4.55% |
| 1996 | 3,827 | −90 | −2.29% |
| 1995 | 3,917 | +83 | +2.17% |
| 1994 | 3,833 | −2,421 | −38.71% |
| 1993 | 6,255 | −94 | −1.48% |
| 1992 | 6,348 | +149 | +2.4% |
| 1991 | 6,200 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
