Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Sao Tome and Principe

Female unemployment in Sao Tome and Principe in 2025 — 9.28%. Ranked 132 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 8.08 pp.

2025 9.28% +0.1 pp vs 2024
World rank 132of 182
Period maximum 24.09%2002
Period minimum 8.81%2018

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Sao Tome and Principe, 1991–202551015202519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 17.36%1992: 17.54%1993: 17.31%1994: 17.24%1995: 17.15%1996: 17.12%1997: 17.19%1998: 17.14%1999: 17.05%2000: 17.06%2001: 23.04%2002: 24.09%2003: 23.52%2004: 22.21%2005: 23.24%2006: 23.29%2007: 22.14%2008: 21.02%2009: 20.3%2010: 19.26%2011: 18.33%2012: 17.09%2013: 15.26%2014: 13.51%2015: 12.01%2016: 10.44%2017: 8.91%2018: 8.81%2019: 8.93%2020: 9.67%2021: 9.53%2022: 9.09%2023: 9.15%2024: 9.18%2025: 9.28%
Change over the period: −8.08 pp Annual average: -0.24 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Sao Tome and Principe

Sao Tome and Principe 9.28%
World 4.94%
Middle Africa computed 6.56%
Female unemployment — Sao Tome and Principe, by year Sao Tome and Principe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 9.28 +0.1 pp
2024 9.18 +0.03 pp
2023 9.15 +0.07 pp
2022 9.09 −0.44 pp
2021 9.53 −0.14 pp
2020 9.67 +0.73 pp
2019 8.93 +0.12 pp
2018 8.81 −0.1 pp
2017 8.91 −1.53 pp
2016 10.44 −1.57 pp
2015 12.01 −1.5 pp
2014 13.51 −1.74 pp
2013 15.26 −1.83 pp
2012 17.09 −1.24 pp
2011 18.33 −0.93 pp
2010 19.26 −1.04 pp
2009 20.3 −0.72 pp
2008 21.02 −1.12 pp
2007 22.14 −1.15 pp
2006 23.29 +0.05 pp
2005 23.24 +1.03 pp
2004 22.21 −1.31 pp
2003 23.52 −0.58 pp
2002 24.09 +1.05 pp
2001 23.04 +5.98 pp
2000 17.06 +0.01 pp
1999 17.05 −0.09 pp
1998 17.14 −0.05 pp
1997 17.19 +0.07 pp
1996 17.12 −0.04 pp
1995 17.15 −0.09 pp
1994 17.24 −0.07 pp
1993 17.31 −0.23 pp
1992 17.54 +0.18 pp
1991 17.36

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.