Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Philippines

Female unemployment in the Philippines in 2025 — 2.48%. Ranked 24 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 1.57 pp.

2025 2.48% −0.01 pp vs 2024
World rank 24of 182
Period maximum 4.33%2006
Period minimum 2.48%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Philippines, 1991–202522.533.544.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 4.05%1992: 4.17%1993: 4.2%1994: 4.09%1995: 4%1996: 3.92%1997: 3.9%1998: 4.01%1999: 4.07%2000: 4.09%2001: 4.02%2002: 3.93%2003: 3.84%2004: 3.89%2005: 4.2%2006: 4.33%2007: 3.71%2008: 4%2009: 4.13%2010: 3.79%2011: 3.83%2012: 3.73%2013: 3.82%2014: 3.72%2015: 3.22%2016: 2.85%2017: 2.7%2018: 2.67%2019: 2.53%2020: 2.72%2021: 3.82%2022: 2.86%2023: 2.48%2024: 2.48%2025: 2.48%
Change over the period: −1.57 pp Annual average: -0.05 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Philippines

Philippines 2.48%
World 4.94%
South-Eastern Asia computed 2.39%
Female unemployment — Philippines, by year Philippines All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 2.48 −0.01 pp
2024 2.48 +0 pp
2023 2.48 −0.38 pp
2022 2.86 −0.96 pp
2021 3.82 +1.1 pp
2020 2.72 +0.19 pp
2019 2.53 −0.15 pp
2018 2.67 −0.03 pp
2017 2.7 −0.15 pp
2016 2.85 −0.37 pp
2015 3.22 −0.51 pp
2014 3.72 −0.1 pp
2013 3.82 +0.09 pp
2012 3.73 −0.1 pp
2011 3.83 +0.04 pp
2010 3.79 −0.34 pp
2009 4.13 +0.13 pp
2008 4 +0.29 pp
2007 3.71 −0.61 pp
2006 4.33 +0.13 pp
2005 4.2 +0.31 pp
2004 3.89 +0.05 pp
2003 3.84 −0.09 pp
2002 3.93 −0.09 pp
2001 4.02 −0.08 pp
2000 4.09 +0.02 pp
1999 4.07 +0.06 pp
1998 4.01 +0.11 pp
1997 3.9 −0.02 pp
1996 3.92 −0.08 pp
1995 4 −0.09 pp
1994 4.09 −0.11 pp
1993 4.2 +0.02 pp
1992 4.17 +0.13 pp
1991 4.05

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.